About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
15:06
4459
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->

Allow to put AP Limitation options in GBs



AuthorAllow to put AP Limitation options in GBs
Lets face it, the main reason why ppl under CL 13 NEVER EVER GB (I wont talk about higher CLs since I have no idea what they have in mind, I talk about what I know) is Russians joining in Full AP and Enchants intentionally in order to get a free win.

GBs right now are a battle mode that is basically 'THE RICHEST WINS'. Honestly, no kidding here.

I ask all Cl 11-12-13 English speakers I know to join my battles and all they say is 'Sorry a Russian gonna join in Full AP and make it boring, dont wanna risk'.

Right now the only thing you can do to play a FAIR battle is play CG, which for poor people is impossible.
And please dont bring the 'Just MG/Hunt for weeks and save money', that makes no sense and is Anti-fun and toxic.

Dont wanna get deeper in this issue, I guess you all know what Im talking about.

If you ever were to put Ap Limitation options: Thx in advance.

(But again, Im negative/pessimistic about the suggestions here being implemented, we all know they wont be, even tho we try to make this a better game).
+

For further info about the issue:
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=2407577
+1 although i do not agree with your arguments such as
the main reason why ppl under CL 13 NEVER EVER GB (I wont talk about higher CLs since I have no idea what they have in mind, I talk about what I know) is Russians joining in Full AP and Enchants intentionally in order to get a free win.

i do however agree that being able to control the ap of those who join the battle you created is only fair ...
else giv the option to withdraw from a gb so that you can withdraw if somebody comes to spoil the game...

and But again, Im negative/pessimistic about the suggestions here being implemented, we all know they wont be, even tho we try to make this a better game
every single game i play... the dev's usually ignore 90% of their fan base's InS even though many are real good and not that hard to implement ...
some are really really good ones and it perplexes me as to y they are not implemented.. maybe not profitable enough idk...
I really have not really much of a say here since I barely (or never) participated in GB mainly due to me not liking them in general and not because players are equip as though it's life or death. But anyways here's my two cents.

Sure from a player perspective, the issue of fairness has always arose, from a simple GB to major events like PoT, etc (like how on earth did AI get so many luck strike with just 1 luck parameter whereas players with 3 are struggling) and yes probably it's good to have such restriction but if you think on the other side of the coin, why would admin even implement this? It's a "group battle" and not "limitation battle", meaning any players whether in min AP or max should be able to join.

Besides admin did provide another avenue for "fair battles" i.e. CG and even tournaments like PT and Mixed. But I guess you're referring to min AP ones, there's another solution i.e. don't create the battles, scout all the other available battles and check each player's profile to see what sort of artifacts they're with and then only join in.

The irony is that almost all games are intended for the rich players, if not who else would pay for server bills, traffic, etc? Although many regard this point as an "excuse" but yes to their disappointment, it is a valid argument. Enrolling and earning gold is part and parcel of the game, if not the most important part.

I'm going to close one eye and pretend that admin representative actually read this forum section but I still doubt it'll get implemented. It will definitely benefit some players like yourself but if does get implemented, who would want join a max enchant player to do GB? Their objective is play to win and they wouldn't want any other enchanted AP players to join. Besides they might as well do Survilurg defence battles which yields a better ratio, chance to get armament, and some margin of gold.
2. Introduce options for arts/no arts combat types. Technical impossibility to join the "wrong" combat type.

https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1997532
closed by ElfPride (2015-11-26 08:52:26)
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM