| Author | Which came first... |
|---|
...the chicken or the egg?
Hydra
the hydra slayer came shortly after |
| I believe in intelligent creation as there are no transitional fossils to support the theory of evolution and all living organisms stemming from one original model and then mutating to create a whole new species. Evolutionist might have come from monkeys but not me. So even if you believe in aliens, like the Hydras who came from the S planet, its the chicken, then the egg, then the omelette. |
| there are tons that do some look up man |
| well we meet again lukeman! Except this time I don't know what you mean. What tons do what look up? I've looked this up in theology. One of my expertises. So if you would like a debate then bring you clarvoeyant game. If you speak of actual transitional states of one animal into another or even the wanna be cromagnum transition, which I will so totally crush you on if you touch that subject, then bring it becuase other than intellectual splicing on human part on vegetable and such, nothing for actual living organisms that supposedly evolved from the dino age exist for complex beings . No not even thay one sea creature(can't remember name right now) split into bat and whale. Even without remembering what it was from I know that there is still no hard proof, but all proof is evident from intellectual creation wether it be from the traditional God or aliens as it just "came into being all of a sudden in ALL explanations of sophisticate beings. The only thing darwinism has is plant life but NOT natural plant life sub-beings but INTELLECTUAL splicing to create things such as cherry tomatoes and such! |
| point being, chicken came first. Now go and question your darwin books for a good answer as you enjoy that omelette. |
| well, if you are a Roman Catholic or beleive on the story of creation from the bible. it was the chicken. if you don't beleive in that, sorry. can't help ya |
| but then how did the chicken get there i would have had to been hatched from an egg, so the egg would have come first |
well, all organisms evolved from tiny microorganism that relied only on small resources and use asexual reproduction(does not need eggs or any kind of conditions, they just split into two), originating from the deep sea which is even before dinosaurs. Then they evolved into fishes, then fishes legs, they found land and reptiles(now dinosaur) then mammals were born, they coped with their new surrounding and so on and so on...So then the first chicken(maybe with fangs and claws :0) was created from the cycle of evolution before the chicken egg.
So definitely the chicken came before the egg :D |
which came first then? the dinosaur,the chicken or the egg?
but dinosaurs came from eggs also didn't they?
the dino came from an egg,that came from a dinosaur,that came from an egg etc..
the chicken also came from an egg that came from a chicken that came from an egg that came .........(SPAM SPAM SPAM etc...) lol
good question...............lol........... no one knows, you should wait and ask god, but it might baffle him as well |
lol have u ever thought that maybe the first chicken was actually a mammal and that it didnt lay eggs and was born by sexual reproduction ? >:o
then later just got bored and started to lay eggs instead? |
Grrrr... How can someone believe in a finite and powerlimited god. If you speak of Zuez yes, Fidel Castro yes, George Bush yes, but a God as creator of all being finite in power???!!
@47 it simply came into being. Just like you wrote and *poof* there are the words right before you eyes without having to wait for them to hatch.
Now mind you I am not stating I am catholic or christian or whatever, just a believer of intellectual creation, meaning someone who knows alot. Think of it as a program that can duplicate itself. The duplication did not exist without the original copy. How can something be duplicated without an original program. The original birth is idea and then spawning is the duplication with minor differentialities if you as creator so choose it that way
Also for strongy, since about 5 or so years ago it is now debated if the dinos were indeed reptilian or mammal. Don't believe what you read just cuz you see it, believe it cuz you know. Don't be a brain in a jar manipulated by the matrix. And by that I mean, one day science says this, then the next it say that. Even in the bible it says question all! So if you believe in the bible you question it until you believe or don't believe. That was just an example for those who follow the bible but should be a good example for all others. Jeez I write alot don't I? |
well, if you are a Roman Catholic or beleive on the story of creation from the bible. it was the chicken. if you don't beleive in that, sorry. can't help ya
Celtic
[>] [q]
47 2009-01-22 10:36:16
but then how did the chicken get there i would have had to been hatched from an egg, so the egg would have come first
Celtic im with u |
well, if you are a Roman Catholic or believe on the story of creation from the bible. it was the chicken. if you don't believe in that, sorry. can't help ya
Celtic
well i don't believe in bible but i believe in God |
Roman Catholis believe in the bible, though it is diffrent from christian bible(not like diffrent faiths often share the same 'version of the bible'), with a few more books added, bible is intregal part of the faith. No I am not catholic but neither are you if you don't accept your faith all the way. Not meant as insult, perhaps you are like me, believe in higher power but not what you are told which fundamentally comes from the bible. Maybe we can speak more on this in chat or pm each other back as this is already going off subject even for off-forum standards. (but I am off to bed soon so if interested just pm and will hit you back up tommorow.)
Well to keep this on subject, chicken, big surprise huh? |
I believe that the egg came first.
Why: Two birds had sex and had laid an egg with a mutated gene in it. It later hatched as a chicken (or chick) and the mutated species survived by having successful adaptions and breeded more chickens.
I think that's how it goes but I'm not too knowledgable on evolution.
Religious point of view: Chicken came first because God created chickens first.
I don't believe in God but I thought I should go with both point of views. |
@ 55
anyone tell you that you should be a politician? Can't lie the way you agreed with all parties is humourous.
oh, yeah, gotta stay on subject, chicken.
for you mods out there, can I get deleted even in off-forum for off subject? |
@ 56
Haha well I wouldn't say I agreed with all parties as I just said that the religious point of view was added to show a party's point of view. I don't agree with this because I'm an athiest (don't believe in God). If I agreed with all parties that would make my statements contradictory :P |
| Sorry for double-post but I read my message 55 where I saidbut I thought I should go with both point of views. I see the the word "go" suggests I agree with both points which as I said is contradictory. Let it be clarified that I believe the egg came first and not the chicken. |
for Celtic:
well, if you READ the bible. God created everything. all birds, NOT eggs =p |
| thats what drawins theory is one creature with on trait would pass it on and though time it would change it take a long time but it better then thinking some guy pointed and said shazam |
