About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
4:08
1354
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Off-game forum-->
<<|<|380|381|382|383|384|385|386|387|388|389|390|>|>>

AuthorFlooders Tenthouse
Anything more will be helpful for the noob
Shoo noob, go learn from your own mistakes :p
Has anyone watched airlift?
Anything more will be helpful for the noob

Take some troops
Has anyone watched airlift?


Yeah, I quite liked the movie. I like movies that are based on true stories. And movies like Airlift inspire you as well because the protagonist is reachable and uses a sense of communal good, perseverance, logical decisions, wit to achieve a greater cause. No superpowers involved. Throw in some images of the Indian flag, thrilling music, glorification of your country etc. and it is a really gripping watch.
Anything more will be helpful for the noob

Summon harpies and wittle down anything while the AI chases down the minos.
for shubhamgoyal:
doesn't TheKnightsss look like George Kutty seeing his posts?
Today's quote:

Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
xD
Summon harpies and wittle down anything while the AI chases down the minos.

That's helpful :P
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.
Niiice, I like this.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.

Which mega-egotist wrote that? Basically claims to be an incredibly great mind because 1) the quote is an idea and 2) he/she is great minded enough to decide who deserves to be called great/average/small minded.

Like many quotes sounds cool but is not that meaningful when seen carefully. But well I do think discussing people should be the lowest if there really is a hierarchy lol.

Reminds me of another quote. Stephen Hawking said something like "Heaven is a fairy tale for people afraid of the dark." and some religious personality came back with "Atheism is for people afraid of light." or something.
Must admit the come back was dope but utterly meaningless.
Anyone wanna duel? Min arts and lev 14-16. Higher lev player gives small stat handicaps to make for a fair battle. CG duels are too hard to find.
Can someone get banned for off-topic posts here? xD
Meshy I dare you :P
Can someone get banned for off-topic posts here? xD


I don't think anything really counts as off-topic here.
If the sun was blue and Earth was red, would lwm exist?
for kulala:
Depends on whether you believe in random butterfly effect. The thing is, you are pretty much asking what if the visible light spectrum had just been reversed in terms of how humans conceive colours (if you meant that the chemicals composing earth and sun had been different, well then probably humans wouldn't even exist). Now, a change like the visible spectrum being flipped upside down would make no difference. Note that green would still remain in the middle, so humans would still have a strong ability of differentiating shades of green necessary for survival. Therefore, we have the same starting point, and a change which makes no difference, thus the question is, would we reach the same end point? It depends on whether you believe in truly random events or not. Think of it this way, you see someone toss a fair coin and you get heads. Then you go back in time till before the coin toss and see the coin toss happen again. Let's assume you can't affect the toss in anyway and let's also assume it wasn't a coin toss (which isn't random at all scientifically), but instead a random quantum event (which scientists claim to be truly random), then, would the chance of getting heads be 50% or 100%? Going by modern science it's 50%, but saying modern science is perfect is false, so it might as well be 100%, or heck, maybe something else entirely.
Now then, if you believe in true randomness (50% again) then no, almost certainly lwm wouldn't have existed. That is because the number of truly random events which would have needed to happen for lwm to exist is really unthinkable. However, if you don't believe in true randomness and believe given the same start and no external influences, a system would reach the same end, then yes lwm would exist and I would still be wasting several minutes of my life typing this response.
Now then, if you believe in true randomness (50% again) then no, almost certainly lwm wouldn't have existed. That is because the number of truly random events which would have needed to happen for lwm to exist is really unthinkable. However, if you don't believe in true randomness and believe given the same start and no external influences, a system would reach the same end, then yes lwm would exist and I would still be wasting several minutes of my life typing this response.

Different causes can lead to the same outcome. So perhaps that if this world was filled with bird people, then maybe bird people would want to play lordswm too, with feathered farmers and stuff.

The thing is, you are pretty much asking what if the visible light spectrum had just been reversed in terms of how humans conceive colours

Well, no... I don't think the sun is more red than it is green or blue. It emits a lot of different wavelenghts, including all the visible spectrum, otherwise you could not see green leaves, and elf symbol would be black. I think you see it red at sun set because of atmosphere diffracting rays. If you did the prism experiment at school, it's just like you're living in the prism and happen to stand where red rays are diffracted. But if you were standing instead where blue rays are diffracted, the sun would look blue. So with our atmosphere it's not going to happen, but with a different composition I don't think it would be impossible to see a blue sun. In fact sometimes setting sun doesn't look that red. I mean it's not green obviously but the shade is clearly different.

Then a reverse of the spectrum is a strange idea. This is because you only reverse the visible spectrum. You would end up with invisible wavelenght in place of visible ones, so red would not look like blue and blue would not look like red.

Lastly your vision of colors is determined by 3 different receptors in your eye, one for every primary colour (and one extra type for low light intensity vision). Just switching wavelenght would not achieve much if the receptors are the same. The colors we see are probably just arbitrarily made up by our brain to represent things. In fact what you see as red might very well be what looks like green to me. There would be no way to tell.
Which mega-egotist wrote that? Basically claims to be an incredibly great mind because 1) the quote is an idea and 2) he/she is great minded enough to decide who deserves to be called great/average/small minded.


I wonder which egotist, not you certainly.
Maybe it was him? But hes trying to hide it by disagreeing!
<<|<|380|381|382|383|384|385|386|387|388|389|390|>|>>
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM