Forums-->General game forum-->
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9
| Author | Campaigs |
|---|
I finished the beginner of it, even though I did all 18 battles without losing any, I got 90%, weird.
The battles were not easy either, so playing it at medium will be bad and the rewards are practicly worthless. I played it with the free set. | Finish the 2nd difficulty with 100% & it seems its like WG * rating coz I lost 2 matches coz of using BB set (sick joke ;p) without suspecting & believing what the stats suggest :(
But still 100% proves that you don't have to win all but rather win with good margins. So Liuker's logic seems right.IMO efficiency depends on the number of stars you get for each combat as if you were playing a WG battle. For each campaign there are a total number of 54 stars so approximately 6% per 3-star battle. You can check it after you finished each battle | only one battle remains on the whole map in my campaign, and the battle is against
28-royal griffin
5-cavalry
1-big guardian with hit point-1004, damage 234-585, initiative-10
3-monk
12- crossbowmen
and this seems impossible for a level 6 hero, what should I do now? how to end this campaign because only that battle remains in my campaign which I will never win. please help ! | | my campaign just got reseted(queen difficulty locked again). Probably yours too.Will we get new rewards if we do it again? | | Preparation for the translation has begun! | for Beliar:
thank you | played easy didnt get the 1%estate lost 3-4 time with cheap arties still 98%
then i played medium still with cheap arties lost 3-4 times still got 98% and got the 1% estate and 10k gold | Some part of the campaign has been translated :-
http://lordswmlwm.blogspot.com/2016/03/campaigns-translation.html | I started as beginner without losing any and got this:
Battles won: 18 out of 18, efficiency rate: 92%.
Reward:
5 Mercury, 5 Sulfur, 5 Crystals, +1% initiative armament for Ancient Behemoths, +1% initiative armament for Chieftains, +1 defense armament for Antichrists, +1% initiative armament for Gargoyles, +1 defense armament for Thunderbirds.
Constant link for your result: https://www.lordswm.com/campaign_result.php?id=46609&key=fc252884fc26ec96
Then I played medium, lost 3 times and got again worthless stuff:
Battles won: 18 out of 18, efficiency rate: 94%.
Reward:
9 Sulfur, 9 Crystals, +2% initiative armament for Death proclaimers, +1% initiative armament for Sphynx guardians, +2% initiative armament for Sky shamans, +1 attack armament for Death proclaimers, +1 attack armament for Skeletons.
Constant link for your result: https://www.lordswm.com/campaign_result.php?id=48530&key=322e8eede0d4ad14
I don't think I'm going to play the hero level since the rewards are lousy, the AP cost of 18 battles is so not worth it. Counting the losses it would cost around 40k to play it through. Not to mention the low exp and sp it gives. It's a nice add to the game but only playable if you have gold to waste.
Also I played it so to get the healing tent and ballista as fast as possible to see if it would show up on the remaining battles and it did not, both only appeared at the final battle which was also a letdown. While in beginner I could control both the healing tent and ballista, in medium I had no control of either. | Preparation for the translation has begun!
Thank you Beliar. | Preparation for the translation has begun!
Thanks, but can we have the text quests first ? | "Looking for the healer" campaign completed by Destructira [11] with Barbarian faction at Recruit difficulty.
Battles won: 16 out of 18, efficiency rate: 83%.
Reward:
Mithril longsword [24/24], +1 defense armament for Fortune genies, +1 attack armament for Warlords, +1 defense armament for Boar riders, +1% initiative armament for Skeletal bowmen.
Constant link for your result: https://www.lordswm.com/campaign_result.php?id=24359&key=be17ac88de62c42c
bored, tactics at least, the texts of the homeless came up with the drawings. | Is there an advantage to having a high efficiency with regard to rewards. If not it would probably be cheaper to deliberately miss certain battles and get to the end. I know each battle has a chance of gaining a reward (I got my estate thing from a random battle not the end).
For LAwton, I do not think the financial aspect is quite as bad as you say, though no doubt not as good as WG. I am sure you could do it for cheaper than 40K, the obsidian set with ring of thorns is reasonable to win without breaking the bank - then you are probably looking at more like 25k (rough estimate)
Reward benefit is are hard to judge in the short term - one estate licence could pay for the arts for the whole campaign, though what the average of these will be long term is difficult to assess. For you if you look at the gold value of the resources - = 18* 360 = 6480. Getting an art during the campaign is not unlikely (I got one with 25 durability) which again will add up to a value of a few 1000.
So as I say , not great, but could be worse. If we end up averaging one licence every 2 campaigns - then super, pretty fair. IF however it is one every 4, then not good.
It may be interesting to see what it is. I have one licence for 36 battles completed.
What are other peoples ratios to work out the liklihood of these coming out? | @Lord MilesTeg, when facing battles like over 4,5k sprites with trees or over 4k guardians with horses, a cheaper set ain't gonna cut it. So far I did 36 battles and got no artifact in any of the battles, one battle gave me 2-3 armaments in both campaigns, rest of the battles gave me nothing, it's as if only one battle will give you something per campaign. Now I don't mind nothing but when you are lvl 15 and face pretty hard battles and then get only 2,9k exp and 1,68 fsp for each battle while spending over 1,5k for your AP, then I'll only play it when they give a free set or I have gold to waste.
Beginner gave 15 resources and 5 armaments, medium gave 18 resources and 5 armaments, so I'm guessing hero level will give like 21 resources and 5 armaments.
And the prices for the 1% are ridiculous, since it's a brand new item in game they slap the most insane prices to them as usual, costing you 4-5 mill to get 100%, while a 5-6 star estate costs the exact same. Must be fools market. | only 2,9k exp and 1,68 fsp
Only?
Only????
That is a very good fsp/xp ratio for lv 15 my friend | for Lawton:
Reward's are random and you were probably unlucky. I have gotten a 2% certificate in battle (not end reward) as well have gotten 2 separate 1% certificates for end rewards. Not to mention the 2 back to back, 1 diamond and 0.7 diamond respectively I have gotten in the last 2 recent battles I did. The FSP/EXP are low and that's undeniable as well as inproportionate considering the amount of troops we have to kill (as you sir have noted yourself) but they are in no way a bad ratio.
Whereas for the prices of certificate, yes they are absurd now but it's simple economics really (less supply=higher prices), give it 3-5 more campaigns and you will see the prices will fall, perhaps even drastically. | I'm trying to work out the drop rates for campaigns. Usbeorn, I counted and you have won just over 100 Campaign battles, with 4% worth of certificate as a reward
I have won 36 with 1% as a reward and Lawton with 36 has got 0 %
so so far (ignoring difficulty and the bias of multiples of 18 (or comPleted campaigns) we have a crude hit rate of 5/174.
So probably 1 for every 2 campaigns over time. IF this holds, whether it is worth it or not financially will depend on how the market price of the licences stabilises over time.
Time will tell. If you want please add your crude numbers to the ones I have put in here and we can get a more refined rough estimate.
Thanks
5/174 | | does anyone have any idea how to do the dryads/trees and guardian/champions battles with dark demon? | | Two combatant ja one hero campaign so 54 won and 0%. | Well I'm stuck on last battle, I have allready lost 4 in a row there making it a total loss of 10 so far at medium level of it. Rewards were crap so far as well, one gave me 3k gold and another gave me 4 armaments I allready had. After losing 3 times in a row the reducement is lousy as well.
It went from:
14 magi
115 gremlin wreckers
129 gremlin wreckers
171 genies
487 grotesques
887 lodestone golems
level 16 genie monster
to:
13 magi
109 gremlin wreckers
122 gremlin wreckers
163 genies
463 grotesques
843 lodestone golems
level 16 genie monster
Looks like the reducement is only 5% troop count, which is really really bad since the admins put an insane amount of troops for me as a level 13 necromancer, the lodestone golems alone onehit anyything. The campaigns seem to work nicely for certain factions while others struggle almost endlessly, bravo admins for creating such imbalance among the factions. |
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|9Back to topics list
|
