About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
16:18
4083
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->General game forum-->

Caravan Event!


<<|<|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15

AuthorCaravan Event!
no i didn;t check player wise, just take a head count form result page, so it is not correct, some DU level player may don't have DU,or some may level up from DU level to non DU level and Vice-versa.
Well players in non-du levels and players whose du doesn't make a difference shouldn't be counted, such as a level 11 elf without du makes no difference. For someone like a lev 13 elf it's impossible.
And yeah it does create disappointment to make such an insane difference in the rewards... 10k for someone with someone with same/more wins, tons AND gold profit as someone who gets 600k, non-sense. And more importantly admins trolled us, they clearly mentions reward will only depends on number of wins.
I do not think the efficiency point is clear.
I do not know my efficiency point and i have not known how to improve my efficiency point to get Commander Ring.
many people think that number of wins include thief battle? They try to get as much as winning thief battle.
It seems that a score is calculated according to the difficulties of everyone's 30 hardest winning battles. The score compared to the average score (for the same level,same faction, same class) is called efficiency.
That can protect the factions that are not very good for this type of battles and encourage players to try different factions (so that the admins can have enough data for the design of new WG tasks)

And I think this strategy will continue in future events.
https://www.lordswm.com/show_my_score.php - view personal score

http://www.heroeswm.ru/forum_messages.php?tid=2411528&page=17#39964198 - proof link
My score is 2501. How much is the score for the guys who scored the rings?
for Loafoant:
http://www.heroeswm.ru/forum_messages.php?tid=2411476

You can scroll down and see the top 100 efficiency score for theirs.
Mine was 3420.

Thanks Graf de Vala for the update.
Oh ok. Thanks. Damn..4K is a lot :O
my score is:
&#194;&#341;&#345;&#341; &#253;&#244;&#244;&#314;&#281;&#328;&#269;&#226;&#237;&#238;&#324;&#328; &#252; &#226; &#269;&#226;&#314;&#237;&#328;&#314;:0

What do you think, what does it mean? :D
for Skoczek:
Didn't work for me either.
Oh wait found it, it was 3404... and i played with the cheapest possible arts to fill in the ap requirements :/ surprising that I stood a chance even without DU =.=

Thanks for the link, now I hate this event even more xD
3510 Too bad I lost some battles due to silly mistakes :s
Should I lock this thread guys?
If you are wondering how as I am not a moderator, I created this, muwahaha xD
This type of rewarding defeat the very core strength/value of this game IMHO. The 1 thing tht every1 love about this game is you can play it at your ease but the hourly changing profit margin,high chances of getting ambushed by real player at peak hours surely affects the game & push player to play at a certain time. Because with so many uncertain condition I don't think a proper model or formula can b generated.

This is a disappointing issue for many games like me who play this at their leisure to enjoy.
On the contrary, this type of rewarding is much more better and fair than previous ones.
for Erathia:
How? I am not being ironic, I really want to know your point of view :)
you can see #225
yes i am agreeing with Erathia
limiting best reward arts is always good,other wise that art will be cheap in market.
In fact i meant the idea to encourage players to try different factions and try to be the best for that faction.
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
<<|<|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14|15
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM