| Author | Please check this multi account player. DeltaStrike |
|---|
http://www.heroeswm.com/warlog.php?warid=471776306
Yes, this person was active in the battle, but notice that his units are:
1) Not helping in attacks
2) Hitting useless targets
3) Placing units in a not logical position.
4) AFK during the deployment phase.
I used some "rough" words during the game because was angry at that player . My apologies in advance.
Regards,
Zazu |
nah he wasnt hitting useless stacks
you know why he spike there when you asked him to arrow ghosts?
thats because he wants to reach my wolves with his rogues
cause i block the rogues with ogres and orcs
although its obvious he cant kill the whole stack
and that time you said he hit useless target
that was really a LOL
did you see properly? that was retaliation to the spawns
and the last one you said he hit wrong target again
he hit the demons so you can defeat the demon
i mean what else can he hit with 5 rogues left
he can only reach my orges, which will just kill the rogues when retaliate
or the 2/3 demons
or you want him to wait/defend/ or just move
and if you used rough words, you should be fined with 5000g penalty :) |
| [Post deleted by moderator Kush // doubled post =)] |
| [Post deleted by moderator Kush // ] |
Soathon, you were involved in the battle.
A third party should be the one evaluating, not you. |
One more question,
Why are you defending your opponent? ;) |
| Cuase your doing something wrong plus its just one battle doesn't matter too much |
1. If you aren't related to the application directly - don't leave your messages in it's topic. Third-party comments are allowed only for providing additional facts about the affair, or for replacing the link to warlog with the more readable battlechat. Discussions, expressing personal opinions, etc. are penalized with at least 24 hour ban.
and so im not defending my opponent, since you accused delta is me in the battle
then again why not? we were only opponent in that battle, that single battle |
Read the topic of this post clearly.
Did I ever say that you are a multi in this discussion, Soathon? I didn't even mention your name.
Funny, only by you yourself mentioning that I have mentioned it in that battle, then people should only know.
So since I am asking the admins to check DeltaStrike only, I ask you again:
Why are you defending him? Worried that the admins might check you too? :P
DeltaStrike acted weirdly in the battle. So let the admins judge if he is a multi or not.
If he is determined as not guilty, then so be it.
Anyway, I will be taking bladeguy's advice and leave this as it is.
Have fun and enjoy the game. |
| so you refuse to admit you accussed me? |
and you ignored my view on what he did during the battle
i would say
1) Not helping in attacks
2) Hitting useless targets
3) Placing units in a not logical position.
all these are false |
I'm stupid enough to comment as a mostly disinterested 3rd party:
I do not believe you can asssess a multi-account via the meagre points put forward either way
There can be various reasons why someone does a thing that makes no sense to you:
rL interference = afk;
playing several different games at the same time = afk;
rl interference = wrong decision;
stoopid = wrong decision;
the player has already given up on that battle as a bad job and is bored
rl interference - the viewer incorrectly interprets the other player's decisions;
playing several different games at the same time - the viewer incorrectly interprets the other player's decisions;
the viewer is stoopid and does not understand what his opponent is doing or why;
etc ...
To claim a multi I recon you have to have a lot better case - as it stands the viewer could be accused of the same thing as he has accused his opponent for equally specious reasons.
I say this as someone who has moments of sheer genius - and other moments that are best not mentioned ... things happen, lighten up an denjoy the friends you make here. |
| closed by Lexa (2008-10-03 23:23:01) |
|---|
