Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->
1|2|3
| Author | Training battles and training hunts |
|---|
| what do you mean? | means u can change... the idea is pritty much a battle simulater... ud be able to choose who/wut u r and who/wut u face on a variety of battlefields
thats the point of it o_0 | | well would be somethink to do middle of normal combats | he doesn't say anything about changing ur own troops only the army u face, at least that how i read it.
the point to to determine how many hunt creatures u can kill with ur current army so dont waste durability and time :) | the point to to determine how many hunt creatures u can kill with ur current army so dont waste durability and time :)
Almost, it has 3 points: 1. to test tactics/strategies and maybe even share them. 2. to see if you would win in a real battle. 3. for fun unranked battles. | Ok we got:
• Army/mana faster recovered in training battle, or perhaps not depleted at all
• Change race in the training room/sandbox
that would defeat the purpose of multi
so +1 :D | | Big -. | I like the idea, but I would prefer it to be toned down a little. To prevent abuse, it should cost you, maybe something like 10-20 gold per character level, still much cheaper than the loss of durability but not quite free. This would encourage a little more thinking and risk-taking (hm, should I spend a little money for a practice run, or should I just go for it?)
Some players are already cowardly enough. Let's not promote that too much. | To prevent abuse, it should cost you, maybe something like 10-20 gold per character level, still much cheaper than the loss of durability but not quite free.
How could you abuse it? You wont get xp, skill points, win/loss ratio, its just to train.
There should also be a combat tutorial to newbies (who dont know what retal is or who dont know you get a shooting penalty for shooting out range with shooters) and customized training etc. | i think its a great idea!
it would show people their limits, abilities, and help experiment tactics and strategies. as for custom battle, i think it would be a great idea and for #13 if they did do that it would be THEIR CHOICE so it would be their fault they lost all that time | and: geryon how would people abuse it?
u get nothing out of it but knowledge of ur guys
its win freaking win baby! | -
You should train on a battlefield.
Because if you have a chanse to train yourself before hunt, they(hunts) won't be interesting, just a copy of training.
And that won't be fair to all the people who beated records in hunts, and broke their artefacts, spent time for the hunts.
This is bad idea. | 32: I can't see how that would work. U will still have to train ur self on the hunts for the money, exp and skill points, but with training battles it would be just something to do in the middle of these hunts as there is a long time between hunts.
It wouldn't be unfair at all because everyone has the same opportunity to train, so everyone would benefit equally. To me, it does seem like a flawless idea, impossible to abused, and something that would bring much beneift to the game. | It wouldn't be unfair at all because everyone has the same opportunity to train, so everyone would benefit equally.
Suppose you're playing a game in which everyone has a chance to use a cheat. Does that make the cheat fair?
Hunts are meant to be challenging, not an already done exercise. Otherwise hunts are obsolete, and the game might as well give you free exp, money, and skill points after you do training, which isn't right.
If the "training battles" were just for fun, then there's also no point because there's a reason why you can't have hunts one after the other. (To spare the server from too many hunts.) | for Serpentguy:
I meant, that this would be unfair to all people, who have done records before, without hunts. And if you had a training battle, you would make a special strategy, to kill all enemy units without big loses in HelthPoints.
I think people from Russian server, will say the same to you.
And the last:
Admins would spend a lot of time to do this Trainings Battles, instead of doing something useful. | | This idea contradicts the purpose of the game. All battles will become a mere replica and mathematical formula of training. | -
You should train on a battlefield.
Because if you have a chanse to train yourself before hunt, they(hunts) won't be interesting, just a copy of training.
And that won't be fair to all the people who beated records in hunts, and broke their artefacts, spent time for the hunts.
This is bad idea.
Anyone can see you dont understand my meaning and idea. You train on a battlefield. You don't get records for hunting, nor xp, sp, or win/loss ratio, not even durability loss.
This idea contradicts the purpose of the game. All battles will become a mere replica and mathematical formula of training.
1. Replica and math? Just training dude -.-
2. It can't be more replicated or mathmetical then now. Everyone calculates in this game.
And the last:
Admins would spend a lot of time to do this Trainings Battles, instead of doing something useful.
Wrong, its a 2-day thing, and VERY USEFUL, but you won't understand because you dont even understand my whole idea (OMG...)
Suppose you're playing a game in which everyone has a chance to use a cheat. Does that make the cheat fair?
Hunts are meant to be challenging, not an already done exercise. Otherwise hunts are obsolete, and the game might as well give you free exp, money, and skill points after you do training, which isn't right.
Suppose you're playing a game in which everyone has a chance to use a cheat. Does that make the cheat fair?
Hunts are meant to be challenging, not an already done exercise. Otherwise hunts are obsolete, and the game might as well give you free exp, money, and skill points after you do training, which isn't right.
If the "training battles" were just for fun, then there's also no point because there's a reason why you can't have hunts one after the other. (To spare the server from too many hunts.)
Same for HELME and God5send, if i weren't that kind and nice, i would call you total morons. | | Ok i got like 25+ right now and 3-'s of (its very hard to not swear) 3 guys that dont understand my idea. | i would call you total morons. [/quote
I jest at your inability to think in a dialectic manner. | for God5end:
If you think its a bad idea, say what i can change about it. And dont whine about the training hunts as its only 5% of my idea. |
1|2|3Back to topics list
|
