| Author | a new way of battles |
|---|
| i'm thinking you should have some kind of communicators or computer controlled opponents. so if someone wants to battle a friend, and he's not online, he can battle a computer version of his friend, and when in a group battle, somebody wants to battle a certain somebody, and someone else comes along, the system will not let the "someone else" come into the battle. |
| it is not a good idea because you will win because human mind and computer are different so it will be a different strategies. Computers do not wait to strike. It will just go to in front front of you and you will have chance to strike it. -1 |
you see, the computer is not the one which is smart. you are. the computer only shows you what you want. and this works the same way. there will be a strategy selecter of one player, that player will be a computer and the computer will use that strategy, and in another way, if you are battling a REAL player and the player becomes afk, the internet will start using the strategy that that player chosen and there will not be any afks in this type of battles.i am saying if the battle starts like this:
hero1 [player], hero2 [player] vs hero3 [player], hero4 [player]
then if player 4's chosen strategy is to strike first, the chart will become this:
hero1 , hero2 vs hero3 , hero4
player , player vs player ,computer
and therefore, there will be no interuption.
and also this battle will make use of the family [computer].so if you applied "brother" relationship with someone, and the "brother" is watching the battle, and the brother's "brother" will take control of the combat if the "brother's" brother is an afk but when the battle finishes, the "brother" instead of going to his brother's account, he will be sent straight to his own account.then, the "brother" will be given the amount of exp instead of the other brother [the afk one]. and will be given a certain amount of gold for helping out. the certain amount of gold for helping will come like this:
lvl 1 helper: 2000gold
lvl 2 helper: 5000gold
lvl 3 helper: 7000gold
lvl 4 helper: 9000gold
lvl 5 helper: 11000gold
lvl 6 helper: 12000gold
lvl 7 helper: 13000gold
lvl 8 helper: 14000gold
lvl 9 helper: 16000gold
lvl 10 helper: 18000gold
lvl 11 helper: 20000gold
lvl 12 helper: 27000gold
lvl 13 helper: 48000gold
lvl 14 helper: 60000gold
which is much because it is seldom they have an afk, and applying as a family is costly. |
U have to understand, that things get abused easily when it involves gold. However, having a computer do the afk job of the player is not such a bad idea at the start.
Still, too easy to get abused. One can go afk without being a "stager" of a combat where his intention is of a good questioning. The smartness of the computer means the player is almost definitely going to win. |
| but i said : "according to that player's set tactics" didn't i? |
| and wasting time is worst than just wasting 1 turn right? |
for jeferypet:
Trust me.. you don't want your idea (in #3) to be implemented. Why??
Do you know how much gold you have to pay for a relationship? It is only 3,000 gold. And the reward you suggested is waaay to much. A level 14 helper will get 60,000 gold for each help/fight?? Wow!!
Do you know that high level players have problems to win a fight because their hunts or Mercenary Quests have become so difficult? If your idea is implemented, I bet ALL high level players will have many "brothers" or "sisters" or whatever who are low combat level players.
What will happen to 'real low level players'? They barely know this game but they have to fight with someone who (actually) has been playing this game for more than 15 months?
Are you (as a combat level 5 player) ready to fight someone who has level 12 or higher knowledge BUT playing as combat level 5?
Many players will abuse it. For example: I am a combat level 12. I can ask you (who is my 'brother') to go AFK. I will play as you.. and I will get 27,000 gold.
And then I will give you 5,000 gold. Nice deal isn't it ? Because if you fight for yourself.. you won't get 5,000 gold! |
so you still don't get it?
impossible. |
| you should know, i would have suggested diamonds. |
| yeah. rayzon understands what i say. |
| at least he is not suggesting diamonds |
| -100 |
| what do you mean by -100? |
| He means your ideea is bad, very bad. |
| well, isn't his idea like having a throne battle? |
| this idea sucks -1 |
