| Author | morale after retaliate |
|---|
if some one retaliate he may trigger with luck but not with morale
if it could trigger with morale it would be cool |
| +1 i like this idea. |
| ... Another stupid idea ... |
| -1 booooooooooooooooooooooooo :P |
-1 Why would you get a morale boost when you get attacked?
Frankly only creatures with bloodlust of some sort would be happy about getting attacked.
(or any barbarian unit.) |
| And very unfair for Necromancers. Again, another idea to unbalanced the game. |
if it could trigger with morale it would be cool
i think it will be not cool if opponent get the morale... :)
-1 |
-1
Then wouldn't creatures with unlimited retaliation like griffins have quite a bit of morale? And possibly be unfair to whole balance issue. Necromancers are at a disadvantage here. |
| -1 |
-1
In general this is another point which highlights that morale and luck are not equivalent abilities.
There is a reason why amulets of luck are more expensive than medals of bravery, luck is generally better than morale.
Giving morale more advatanges to compensate is not the answer to this. |
| And very unfair for Necromancers. Again, another idea to unbalanced the game. |
it would ruin all strategy in battles.
for exemple, imagine you send 1 poisoner to take retal of EFK, and want to send lizards kill EFK after that.
but EFK has morale on retaliation, plays before lizards and kill them.
small stacks would become useless because of this problem.
we would all play without splitting our units, like if we used AFK settlement. |
Then wouldn't creatures with unlimited retaliation like griffins have quite a bit of morale? And possibly be unfair to whole balance issue. Necromancers are at a disadvantage here.
@8 thats what im thinking LOL |
| -1 |
