Forums-->General game forum-->
| Author | stop using priority as a counter-argument at I&S |
|---|
Don't get me wrong. I respect everyone here, and I'm not feeling mistreated or something.
Just throwing up a bone, which could spark an interesting conversation (or not, we'll see)...
I've noticed that a lot of ideas here at I&S are being discussed with the 'priority of implementation' in mind - 'the admins have more important things to do'-arguments, so to speak.
My suggestion here is to stop giving that argument.
Yes, ofcourse, the admins should focus on the merger, on the return of the tavern tourney, on the rebalancing of certain battle-modes, etc.
But that doesn't say anything, content-wise, about the idea in question. More so, it spoils the fun of brainstorming, of imagining how you want this game to be.
And, finally, I understand it is forbidden to discuss the admins' actions in public. You can get banned for it. Who are we, then, to say what the admins should do first? (And why is it allowed in the first place?) | which could spark an interesting conversation
This thread is more like a discussion, rather than an idea to improve the game process. So, it better be in GGF. | | Topic moved from "Ideas and suggestions" to "General game forum". | [Post deleted by moderator SV22 // ]
[Player banned by moderator SV22 until 2012-08-09 06:41:03 // Discussion about admins is forbidden.] | for stoter:
yes, I think it is positive not to stop the brainstorm of ideas.
for Gyver:
please stay strictly on topic. Such message would be better to send to the topic maker by PM instead or keep to yourself. | stop using priority as a counter-argument at I&S
+1
I&S is for ideas not necessarily ideas that will be implemented.
You should judge ideas based on their awesomeness not their likelihood to be implemented |
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
Back to topics list
|
