| Author | AP requirement for quick tournaments . |
|---|
90% of the times i am teamed up with someone who doesnt even have more than 15-20 ap.. i dont understand why do they join to cause team loses?
The solution is simple, Since its FFA and enchants are allowed , there should be a minimum amount of ap required to participate (2x2 and 3x3) unless its supposed to be another game feature just as useless as anything. |
| There is already a minimum ap for the tourny? |
for virtual_vitrea:
u mean there should be an automatic AP filter which will balance the battle by choosing relevant players? If yes then +1 |
| this dont work when silly players can still do join with skill level 1 and no upgrade units |
i dont understand why do they join to cause team loses?
Maybe because they are poor. Maybe quick tournaments are meant for poor players. |
| The min ap required is 20 ap... i think it should be atleast equivalent to CG . |
The min ap required is 20 ap... i think it should be atleast equivalent to CG .
+1 |
| Come on friends... The server is already providing battles which can be won only with Full AP. All the events(Survilurgs and the other which they gave in the past) required full AP of the lord. I sense this is the only thing what players can participate, other than that of hunts and MG quests. |
| @8: hey buddy- better event for poor players is group battle- only minimum ap required and dont need to pay hundreds gold enter fee |
Maybe quick tournaments are meant for poor players.
If it was meant for poor players there would be an option to join min AP battle's.
I can find myself in what virtual_vitrea said.
90% of the times i am teamed up with someone who doesnt even have more than 15-20 ap
Wich is kinda frustrating if you're hoping for 3 - 4wins (25 - 40 fsp). |
| @10: if virtual's plan all opponents minimum full ap so still no 3-4 wins for you) |
for 4themassive:
More wins, no noob team mate's, teams are more even, more wins. |
@12: yes but you have only 1-2 players will improve. enemy will have 2-3. you wont get more wins
Player banned by moderator GeraldTarrant until 2013-07-30 04:49:29 // Only Main characters should post in the forums |
Ofc I will, then it depends on faction level and the fact who's wearing enchants and who's not.
Atleast I'll have 2 friends with gear so I won't stand alone against 3 players (wich happens most of the time's).
I don't mind them other players having full gear? I'll still kick their asses :). |
90% of the times i am teamed up with someone who doesnt even have more than 15-20 ap
Wich is kinda frustrating if you're hoping for 3 - 4wins (25 - 40 fsp).
Is your real life luck really that bad? One would think that there is a 50/50 chance that you will be in a team with the superior artifacts. You've never fought against players with only the minimum AP and your teammate full AP? |
Is your real life luck really that bad? One would think that there is a 50/50 chance that you will be in a team with the superior artifacts. You've never fought against players with only the minimum AP and your teammate full AP?
yes i did and that wasnt fun either.
Besides, the problem is if you have enchants and your teammates got 20-30 ap... you cant win it against 3 full gear ppl ;) |
Is your real life luck really that bad? One would think that there is a 50/50 chance that you will be in a team with the superior artifacts. You've never fought against players with only the minimum AP and your teammate full AP?
Yes indeed, Most of the time my friends are undergeared, and i'm facing three geared players on my own (even thou I wear enchants). |
| A simpler answer would be to not use QT, fight the old-fashioned way (with your mouse and keyboard) |
since when is quittin something a solution to the problem?
to huntress:
i really liked some of your ideas , but dont just post simply. |
Meh, QTs are fine they way they are (for the most part) They already have minimum AP reqs to participate. Perhaps higher (double, maybe) AP requirements could be implemented for certain matches (like every other match)
Example:
2v2 QT
3v3 QT
2v2 QT (2x AP req)
3v3 QT (2x AP req)
It simply doesn't strike me as entirely necessary, although I do see your greivance with the current AP-req as a whole. |
