About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
7:47
2726
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->
1|2

Authorsituation challenge
i had already created an post saying introduce miror battles in survilurgs...
but this is different.

since many of u like the POT event so much why shouldn't be there a permanent category under battles called situation challenge in which when we apply with min ap we get a random team mixed with all factions and even our opponent does.

this way we battle out using our brains and this will also help us to find the skills of each creature very well when mixed with different creatures and their abilities.

this will also help us to form the perfect team for the upcoming POT events in the future ^_^ ...

~~~~~~~
siddi1111
Player banned by moderator Arcanide until 2014-05-11 03:11:15 // Long string (warning)
+1 ! :)
+1 :)
+1 to a new battle category and opportunity.

since many of u like the POT event so much why shouldn't be there a permanent category under battles called situation challenge in which when we apply with min ap we get a random team mixed with all factions and even our opponent does.
Why only min ap?

this will also help us to form the perfect team for the upcoming POT events in the future ^_^ ...
I don't understand the relation between your suggestion and PoT. Are you saying that these battles you suggest will have troops bought with CoTs?
not only min ap its ur choice but u cant go lower than min ap.

and i meant that when we get random troops like this we get more knowledge about what kind of team we should choose in portal events!
and
no we dont need cot's)
The Only disadvantage will be that

people would not have that craze and excitement for PoT

this will also help us to form the perfect team for the upcoming POT events in the future ^_^ ...


People love PoT
whenever the event comes many people are online
If it will be made for everyday
very less people will participate in PoT
It will be then just an event for arts :(
for Ultimate-Mage:
Lets have a limit 2 or 3 battles a day !
+1 :)
not only min ap its ur choice but u cant go lower than min ap.
If players with different APs join, how do you form random teams? How do you ensure the fairness?

and i meant that when we get random troops like this we get more knowledge about what kind of team we should choose in portal events!
What do you mean by random troops? If you say, no we dont need cot's), how do you limit the number of troops players can choose?
very less people will participate in PoT
PoT allows players to develop faction resistances very easily. Because of this alone, its popularity will not go down by much.
your suggestion will allow people to build faction resistence in other factions without building castle for it and thereferore manny will join BUT even with a limited number of fights per day people will be stucked on a faction on wich they have no building and will be unable to play any other battles
+1
no people wont get faction points..

we get only exp.pts..

gold, any 1 resource and a 20% chance to loot artifacts of high lvl such as if u are lvl 9 u get mithril longsword(10/10)

and its the player's wish to choose his ap.

its like group battle only but its a mixed team!

and the amount of troops given are equal for both the players.

and u can play this battle only 3 times a day! ^_^

so players will do their best to win :D

~~~~~~~~
SIDDI1111
Player banned by moderator Arcanide until 2014-05-11 03:22:09 // Long string (second warning)
We can make a guild for it..
We will get very little fsp.
To participate we need to come with proper ammunition
As our guild level grows the min ap. decreases..
and we have chance to loot arts (7/7)
We get gold rewards from say.. level 5
and etc..

all this can make people not to make it use for faction resistance
or gold making. like that
+1
+1 to 14

yup nice idea

not lvl 5 lets make it 7

as mg start from 5

this battle starts from 7

and cg starts from 9

^_^
I think Admins should give us the ability to fight each other using crystals of time, instead of fighting some random creatures, in duels or 2v2/3v3 with our own custom army. Each additional win grants additional crystals or points to buy more creatures for our custom army. :D
for ajith: then people would find POT as an orfinary tournament.

thats why i am saying we dont need cot

the no. of troops increase with each combat lvl and situation challenge( s.c )guild pts.

such as a guy with sc lvl1 gets 4 unicorns
and a guy with sc lvl2 gets 6 unicorns
no people wont get faction points..
we get only exp.pts..

So, exp without fsp? Personally, I wouldn't play a single battle of this type. It would just make my character weaker.

and the amount of troops given are equal for both the players.
So, you are suggesting an exact mirrored army?

As our guild level grows the min ap. decreases..

I do not think this is logical. A player will level up along with increasing guild levels. So, lower levels are more likely to have lower guild levels. According to your argument, low levels are expected to wear higher ap than higher levels? This just isn't right.

all this can make people not to make it use for faction resistance
or gold making. like that

Any fsp or gold is good. If you allow players to fight this battle type without developed castles, this will be used for developing faction resistances. If the gold output at the end of the battle is more than the gold spent for arts, it will be used for gold making. I am not saying its bad, I am just pointing out the fact :)

not lvl 5 lets make it 7
Ultimate-Mage can correct me but I think he was talking about guild level 5, not combat level 5:P

the no. of troops increase with each combat lvl and situation challenge( s.c )guild pts.
There is a huge variety in the number of possible troop allocations. If troop allocations and numbers just depend on combat levels and guild points, I can only assume you are talking about a very large number of guild levels. Are you?
So, exp without fsp? Personally, I wouldn't play a single battle of this type. It would just make my character weaker.

Then we should get little fsp.. as in MG quests

So, you are suggesting an exact mirrored army?
It should be like PoT .. as we level up .. we have some points through which we can recruit more troops and our enemy too .. but not mirrored

I do not think this is logical. A player will level up along with increasing guild levels. So, lower levels are more likely to have lower guild levels. According to your argument, low levels are expected to wear higher ap than higher levels? This just isn't right.

I mean like a level 6 player at beginning needs to have 12 ap.
As he grows to highest level It will be min ap.
Each character's min ap .. also depends on level.
If a level 10 player is at highest level .. then too he needs 9 ap :)

Any fsp or gold is good. If you allow players to fight this battle type without developed castles, this will be used for developing faction resistances. If the gold output at the end of the battle is more than the gold spent for arts, it will be used for gold making. I am not saying its bad, I am just pointing out the fact :)

Let admins decide this ;)

he was talking about guild level 5
1|2
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM