About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
17:00
4526
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->

minor changes to AG and WG



Authorminor changes to AG and WG
in AG

- please add skip button to the conversations because we finished the same adventure many times. I don't need to listen to it over and over

-add an indicator in where my result got effected and allow players to repeat the battles even if no exp earned

-we should be allowed to see the enemies we are about to fight
so we can determine what troops we should use
===
in WG

- if I lost in a battle we should be allowed to switch to another faction
I don't see why I am forced to play with same faction



-
For AG, I agree a toggable option of skip conversations would be a good QoL improvement.

For WG sometimes you have an advantage compared to original battles played asyou know what you are facing.

For example any of the ones where they were originally treasure vaults you have an advantagem you know if you face elementals, or dragons, or shrews etc, allowing adjustment of recruitment and arts compared to the original battles won.

Conversely, for the hunt type battles in the original fights in which the comparison is made for how many stars you get they would have known how may of each enemy they would face. That being said this only significantly impacts demand, and less so army selection

In other battles we would not have originally known numbers so WG should match this.

So for me I think we already have an advantage more often than not, and so do not think we need more info in advance.

If you had a free switch of faction that would give the same advantage as Abu-Bakr gives, so again I think not.
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM