| Author | Crossroads of Mysteries |
|---|
Git gud in game and learn to play instead of copying battles
Good that devs stop letting people copy battles |
| So good you said it twice |
| Good enough not to copy battles, but not good enough to avoid copying comments… :P |
all fax no cap
tbh if this event was copy expect 500 people with perfect score i lost 2 battles didnt copy single battles. was one of first to complete event and only lost 2 battles.
placed at 75.
this just proves most players in game no iq but get perfect score from copying battles or playing in imperial enchant full set
see some com players doing quite well also, smart players in this server |
for kchong:
Wait enchant items work in event?
I need to start taking events more serious. I just auto place units even tho in regular arts most battles are easily winnable. |
This was an interesting one I felt. Much of it depends upon judgement before the battle with assessing your default army versus the opponents. My losses,(I suspect like everyone), came from either being over optimistic in choosing to fight the harder enemy because you got a better stat, or else selecting the wrong set up.
Normally in events you get battles which you lose, which you were never likely to win as just the balancing making them very hard, and while frustrating you can accept this. In this one I knew I could win every battle, and that the ones I lost I had lost not from what I did on the battlefield but from poor judgement before I got there. This made those losses slightly more frustrating.
For example when facing loads of druids, anchorites etc I thought to myself I cannot avoid the shooting damage or magic, so went Wiz who cannot get hit by lighting and who can get fully buffed by genies. Logic was fine for the start, but the amount of hp was way more than the mana I had taken. A rush elf army however made short work of them. You live and learn..... |
for kchong:
You're quite right to some extent.
Could've been the case you stated that 500 people would have gotten max score if everyone had the same battles. But there are still some players who excel at strategic gameplay better than all others. Even the Daily site showing Event Rankings of players doesn't really throw light on skills, but more of a conservative approach of players(ofc not all).I believe there can never be fairness when it comes to events as long as there is RNG in this game. If there were no RNG, maybe we could have had more of such events where individual skill exceeds copying skills, but well.
As long as FFA events are concerned, it is all about getting luck and morale. Whoever doesn't, loses. A few people still get max scores in FFA events without Imperials, maybe not all but some really do. |
| Question: How do they determine the relative ranks among players with the same total points? |
| for bp99:they will be same place, if 50 people have perfect score then 50 people will be rank 1, 51-100 have 1 loss then 51-100 will have rank 51, so on so forth. |
| It basically means that your rank is higher than what is shows on the event page as anyone who got the same points before you did will be ranked higher. If you finished quick then maybe not a lot higher, if you finished late then your final track may be quite a bit more than you can see at the moment |
| ignore the rankings on event page. once the anouncement comes out it will show as i described it. And for the purposes of the art reward. |
| Glad to know that I may get 5 more warhammerthrowers :) |
This event was actually quite nice.
I feel disappointed with my losses as they were preventable but oh well :D |
