| Author | Bill Gates ftw |
|---|
I think that people who have more money then others shouldn't get the advantage... I think it should be that you pay for a sort of 'membership' which would allow you to get more special artifacts... and perhaps open up more parts of the map.
It is not fair to the players who have spent the time in this game to be beat by a few noobs who spend $20 on this game.
Any supporters? :)
~Zeme |
| i support you. i played for fun, not to see who has more money |
what ftw? o.O''
i keep seeing those letters. |
| playing with real money always win, unless it their advantage in combat is limited. |
The reason soo simple, why they (admin) must be work hard to make this game? invest they mind, money (to hire staff programer or pay server, etc maybe)
just to give us free game forever? :p |
the advantage could be another one than haee strong creatures earlier
maybe a stecile time of a premium where your army restores quicker yyou get more exo and so on. but this with updgrading ealrier is just unfair =/ |
| ftw = For The Win. Or often, "For Teh Win" :) |
6
Yeah im agree too, allow upgrade strong creatures early is bad idea for game balance but good for them to make a lot money.. :p |
ya.. i am poor but I'm hardworking, i thought that is good enough to earn respects in this game... but i realized that i was wrong when i saw the benefit for those player who are rich enough to donate, i will be far far behind them even though i am much much more hardworking then they are. Well what to say... that's facts of life, rich people always get ahead of the poor!
just my 5 cent worth of thought
please don't bother to flame me cause i am a low self esteem player ;( |
who have spent the time in this game to be beat by a few noobs who spend $20 on this game.
if he's realy noob, u'l defeat him even with Up-ed monsters. wmz gives not so much bonuses as u say. |
this game should depend on how much skill / strategy people have, not how much people spend on the game
~Zeme |
| I agree, I mean donating money is probably needed to keep improving the game, but the incentives should probably be more fair e.g. temp. increased exp, faction point gain? trade for gold etc. but not access to better units etc. earlier |
| i agree, upgrade troop must be in same levels :), paying to upgrade the castle its a good advantage, u could spend the momey in artifacts :) |
| Call me cynical, but recall the earlier discussions on Ammunition Points and how they ruined the game for .ru players. Am I the only one who suspects that within a few months, the Top 500 game will be limited to people who donate??? |
i quite agree with all of you.. but honestly i care just a little... i'm already doing only hunts and quests... too many problems with battles, i don' enjoy them any more...
so, for a hunter-quester, the presence of people who spend lot of money for a game is not such a problem...
let's see this way: thanks to the paying player, i can keep on being a not-paying one :P |
| bump |
| http://www.heroeswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1834936 |
15
You said it perfectly. Thanks to them we wont need to play. Isn't that a good advantage enough? Those paying players might complain, "How could i still lose even when i'm paying so much" or even "why am i the only one paying for the game and the others are playing for free?" This arguement could take on forever =P |
| Bevan, I paid in plenty of online games where paying players don't get any advantage in PvP. And I paid wholeheartedly - so I guess something escapes you. |
| ))))) |
