Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->
| Author | Nickel, Steel, Magic powder on Market? |
|---|
Why don't we allow the sale of Nickel, steel and magic powder on market, and trade between players, like the other 6 major resources?
Personally, I think it will increase the cash flow in the game. | | I agree. If you buy one of these resources to enroll at that facility, you're stuck with it as you have no good way to get rid of it. They cost too much for most production facilities to buy them from you. | | why not include leather as well, for that matter, it's one of the primary resources too (that is, produced in a mining facility). | | Agree. | | Yes | | Disagree. Only purpose of trading these commodities would be abuse by multis. | Only purpose of trading these commodities would be abuse by multis
any how is it the only purpose? what if I need leather to quickly enroll at at the leather armor factory for example, and I need to secure a spot quickly, and there's no guarantee that the spot will be here when I get back with 4 minutes of travel. can't argue with that logic | leather as well,
yes, my bad, forgot it :)
Only purpose of trading these commodities would be abuse by multis.
I don't think so, there are basicly the same trading methods as the other resources, like wood, ore, mercury, ... Do you think their trading has been abused by multis? | Do you think their trading has been abused by multis?
In fact yes(like 1 wood for 500 gold), but thats not the topic. I just dont think it needs to be done, because you can buy them anytime in their sites and their only purpose is to resell them, thats why they have been not allowed to trade by administration, to give those resources fixed prices.
ReIncarnate most of the times you have seconds to sell the resource so if you go to market and back there will probably be someone else who already did sell the thing.
Yes there might be a positive effect for those who have bought them by accident and want to get gold fast(and to the traders who can make profit on that), but there are bunch of negatives that I think might appear.
post 6:
Not very smart to use the word ONLY. Maybe "a large proportion of speculative trades of those resources" might be more precise statement. |
Back to topics list
|
