About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
0:22
2899
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Complaints and applications - Violations in tavern and battles-->

Intended having merged fight



AuthorIntended having merged fight
The character Kalymnos intend has disengaged

https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?warid=480481059
[Player banned by moderator Kotrin until 2009-06-30 06:25:43 // Use mandatory complaint form next time.]
Was not my fault, I lost internet connection.
there is nothing illigal here. AFKing is NOT against the ruels
Quote: #373 LWM - Keepers. Violations in tavern and battles
Staged combats, paid-for combats, deliberate loses, bad sportsmanship, giveaway combats.
- first infringement, 5,000 gold
- second infringement, 20,000 gold
- third infringement, 50,000 gold
- fourth infringement = character block.
There is possibility of premature block in exceptional cases.
Quote end

Intensional AFKs is bad sportsmanship isnt it?
... Kalymnos.. started a battle with minart.. it was in description..that everyone can read it.

-terran- joined with fullart... this is bat sportsmanship..

kalymnos didnt do anything bad.
He shouldnt be blamed for beeing afk. Everyone would do it in his position.
[Player banned by moderator Kotrin until 2009-06-29 07:27:07 // Complaints and application forum is NOT a place for discussion - especially if you are unrelated to the complaint. Warning.]
I do not think that here all on are silly to leave in deliberate afk so much.
That is proved to those that he wrote in a chat, but did not go, and there there were words that "I will stand and where I will not go"
And this infringement of rules
but if you didnt wear full arts... it wouldnt go so far..


its afk anyway.. if a player is online.. but didnt move.. its the same going somewhere in real live and not being on computer..

he went afk.. cose he didnt want you to get exp.. because it was a unfair match at the beginning.

everyone would do that!

no one would play an unfair match.

so dont blame him or other players, who want to have fair matches.
@ -Terran-:

-Watch the battle again, nowhere in the chat is it shown that I said "I will stand and where I will not go", so don't try to put words in my mouth.

-As I said before the internet connection was lost, it was not an intended afk.

-In game you said "The fight description is not game rules". Violating battle discription on purpose (like you did) it IS bad sportsmanship and it does actually violating the rule. That's my understanding of the rules though, I am looking forward for the admins to look into this issue.
The description of the demand for fight is only a wish and it is not obligatory for execution. Infringement of conditions of the demand to fight is not infringement of game rules
No proof thatKalymnos deliberately went afk.
From battle chat:

1~2:[Kalymnos]: hey, I said 8 ap
2~2:[Kalymnos]: why did you join?
3~2:[Kalymnos]: I am not going to move
4~2:[Kalymnos]: I will stay here and watch

Intentional AFK for sure.

... Kalymnos.. started a battle with minart.. it was in description..that everyone can read it.
-terran- joined with fullart... this is bat sportsmanship..
kalymnos didnt do anything bad.
He shouldnt be blamed for beeing afk. Everyone would do it in his position.


-terran- didn't follow guidelines given in battle description, but there is no obligation of doing so.
closed by Lord Kotrin (2009-06-29 10:25:29)
Back to topics list
2008-2022, online games LordsWM