| Author | Better reward for defending against ambushes |
|---|
Being ambush is 95% a waste of time for the defender. They are either going around for a merc quest or to help someone in a hunt. Both of those are dependent on time. Even though I manage to win against a few ambushes I get less than I would in a duel and suffer from a one sided battle anyways.
Some gold or better exp and skill gain for being attack by an ambush, especially if you win, would be nice or a good chance of getting items/artifacts would help off-set the ordeal.
The turn timer for ambushes is too long also, that just add the the time wasting if one of the players is not there or decide to move very slow. |
| -1 |
| -1 |
| -1 |
| -1 for many reasons. If you dont like being ambushed, travel without troops, or with one unit. People travel in full arts getting 10 000 exp per fight. |
| -1 |
| -1. to have this implented there should be better reward for the thief if win, and worse consequence for ambushed for losin |
| -1 |
-1
Agree with #7.
As it stands now players like Matanzas think defending against an ambush is a waste of time. If victims actually lose like 1000 gold, then victims would actually bother defending. |
If victims actually lose like 1000 gold, then victims would actually bother defending.
And the thiefs would actually bother attacking with everything they have got. |
| yeah, I never been in an ambush bt 've seen them... I think they are not fare... |
#5
I'm not sure where you are getting your 10k exp per fight but as it stand on lv6 I'm lucky to come out with 1k exp for an ambush win.
#7
the thief is gaining in the guild for their victory, which is beneficial to them much more than anything a defender could possibly get. Greater punishment for a losing thief, IMO, won't help anyone out because the thief can not chose his/her targets and they already have a good reason to want to win.
#9
ambush is a waste of time for defender %95 of time, I stated that, there little reason for defender to defend and little they can do to prevent ambushes other than removing all your units every time to cross borders which will defeat the purpose of having ambushes in the same way as having everyone pick in advance whether or not they want to be ambush. A larger punishment on defender of ambushes is not going to help anyone out in the long run. It is sometimes impossible to win an ambush regardless of the defender skill or stat and to punish someone even when they put a good faith effort in is not in the spirit of the fair game-play.
Thank you to those who state their reason why they think it's bad. I think that by showing my reason and yours about this topic and others topics it help make the game better.
I merely wish that defender, being at a disadvantage from the beginning of the match, would have something extra if they manage to win. if you fight someone on a higher level you get more exp. than normal due to it being harder, so an ambush should be thought of in the same way.
Message me if you wish to discuss this in more detail and Thanks again for the responses. |
| closed by Matanzas (2009-07-24 17:44:04) |
|---|
