Forums-->Problems and errors (general)-->
1|2
| Author | inadequate behaviour of some players |
|---|
Just to answer your claim of you not being off-topic: yes, you are right (I didn't even imply otherwise during this exchange of opinions)
Well it seems that you are mistaken in your belief. It appears that you are unable to remember what you have said in the *very* recent past, in this very thread.
You did indeed imply that I had posted in the wrong topic very early on in this topic. To refresh your memory -
As I said, post your complaint in the proper topic. I will answer you there. Thank you!
This is your post #5 in response to my post #4. I had to clear this up in post #6.
In post #6 I requested an example of my alleged "uncivilised" behaviour. In addition I posted a real solution to your apparent problem of other players accusing me publicly which you consider to be an act of denigration against you. I truly believe that if you follow my suggestions in post #4 you might be able to avoid further instances of players Accusing me for having multi without any proof.
Do you really wish to continue to with your baseless claims and inability to provide any proof for your accusations, let alone remember your own words?
You are now changing from your own statement made at the time LOL! Guys, you really make me laugh! Such kids you are! :)) and deliberately choosing to be insulted in a weak attempt to seek punishment for others.
In your own words some players here find a way to destroy your good mood, but don't let them win by entering their wicked games.. Perhaps you should follow your own advice?
Just so you know, I do not expect any action from the Admins resulting from your claim. If Pang had believed you had a legitimate complaint he would have directed you to the CaA forums that you are so fond of directing others to. The fact that he diverted you here instead indicates to me that he wanted to give you a place to vent your frustration where you could cause no harm, to yourself or anyone else. If the Mods thought you had a genuine claim, they have the authority to do something about it. It was posted in a forum after all, which is the realm of the Moderator.
Goodbye.
Grunge | Slight mistake. Paragraph 6 should read "In post #4 I requested .......".
Grunge | Well it seems that you are mistaken in your belief. - No, I am not.
As I said, post your complaint in the proper topic. I will answer you there. Thank you! - I was refering to your accusation of Anita2008 being my support character.
Do you really wish to continue to with your baseless claims and inability to provide any proof for your accusations, let alone remember your own words? - I did provide you with the requested answers. And I repeat, if you don't see or you don't want to see, it's not my concern.
and deliberately choosing to be insulted in a weak attempt to seek punishment for others. - No comment. You said it with your own words.
If Pang had believed you had a legitimate complaint he would have directed you to the CaA forums that you are so fond of directing others to. - He did directed me to CaA, but in the two subsections there is no place for such type of complaint (read the descriptions from the CaA subsections). I chose this section as being the most suitable for my complaint.
Goodbye! | *SIGH* again.
Once again, your own words - I was trying to find a forum section where I could post the following message and Pang suggested this section. It's almost the first thing you said when you posted this topic. It truly seems that you are unable to remember what you have previously said. You don't seem to be able to keep your story straight.
Post #4 was my first post in this topic. You had already responded to marked_ones comment (post #2) in post #3. There were no other posts for you to respond to. There were 4 minutes between my post and your response. Trying to deny the reality of your obvious mistake in your post #20 is futile. It is plainly there for anyone who cares to look.
Do you really wish to continue to embarass yourself in this fashion?
Grunge | "Just to answer your claim of you not being off-topic: yes, you are right (I didn't even imply otherwise during this exchange of opinions) and you had and have the right to come with proof for your innocence (if you succeded or not, that's not my place to say it, I will let the admins to decide that). That's why I didn't move this discussion on private and I answered to you here."
this really shows that you don't understand what justice is all about, the person being accused shouldn't have to provide any evidence that he's not guilty, you should provide some evidence that he is, which you have failed to do through this whole topic.
So by starting this topic you have pretty much done the same thing you are accusing others of doing, making accusations without any evidence... | you can go CaA sub forum to do the complaint or post a topic on Game Problem sub forum so on. - Pang's words.
You had already responded to marked_ones comment (post #2) in post #3. - Yes, we had a nice conversation privately and I thank him for his advices from that conversation.
I keep up with my story coherently enough. Only that I don't give you more information than you need. I just answer you. But, nevertheless, you start to show your real you as you did in the thread I mentioned before. You try to denigrate your opponent and to interpret wrongly his words when you have no more arguments against him. You made a nice example here with your posts. | "But, nevertheless, you start to show your real you as you did in the thread I mentioned before. You try to denigrate your opponent and to interpret wrongly his words when you have no more arguments against him. You made a nice example here with your posts."
your kidding right? you really can't see that this part describes exactly what you've been doing, mainly in the other topic, that you're complaining about here, but also partly in this one??:O | In what way have I done this - interpret wrongly his words.
You *did* say that Pang suggested this Section of the Forum (post #1). You *also* then claimed that Pang had directed you to the CaA forum because it suited your purposes at the time (post #23). Until your post #26 you have at no point mentioned that Pang directed you to both. Are there words from other Moderators that you would seek to misquote to your fleeting advantage?
It is difficult to interpret someone's words correctly when they do not provide correct information themselves. Is it really necessary for me to try and guess which things you say that you will later contradict? You cannot seriously expect this.
Thanks to Madridista for your comments regarding the accusations I have had placed upon me by CGSMCMLXXV. I tried to point this contradiction out to CGSMCMLXXV in my post #16, first paragraph. I doubt that he has noticed.
Oh and finally - Only that I don't give you more information than you need. In this thread you have requested intervention by the Administrators. The information you are providing is supposed to be for their benefit also, so they can make a just decision based on the facts. Perhaps they might like to know what other information you are keeping from *them* on this matter, because it suits *your* purposes.
You have accused me and I have the right to defend myself, right recognized in most *civilised* societies. Perhaps you should reconsider who is acting in an uncivilized manner? I am happy to submit myself to the administrators judgement on this matter. How about you?
Grunge | Hmmmmmm... Didn't see post #27 before I posted #28.
Don't think it changes any of my points.
Grunge | I am happy to submit myself to the administrators judgement on this matter. How about you? - Good. Let's leave this matter to the administrators to decide. I opened this thread, so, I took the take responsability for what I wrote.
Madridista, I made an accusation, I brought my evidence (if you read better, you can find it), I left Grunge to come with his arguments, so, I understand what is justice. And I am not kidding. I don't know what is your relation with Grunge, but I really don't care because I don't see how your claims can be regarded as substantial. Seemingly, you have the same kind of expressing your self (that doesn't mean I consider you both right, but it's a curiosity how two people express themselves in the same way).
Grunge, since when the information about Pang is so important in this context? Again you are trying to find a flaw in my coherence and nothing else. If you consider that you made your point, then wait for the administrators to decide. By trying to find and to emphasize that I didn't give all the information which is irrelevant for my accusation regarding you proves my point.
And with that if you both want to continue by finding flaws in my posts, it's up to you, I consider I proved my point. Anyway, I let you both search for further flaws in my logic and I will let the admins to decide the end of the story.
Bye! | Still, Omega22 is continuing to call my girlfriend's account my multi (which implies we lie)
Please quote where I called Anita`s account a multi? I dont remember such topic. And if you want to quote the long blocked thread by I_own_you_all post 127 explains the typo in post 120.
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1860133&page=6 | There's no need to worry Omega22.
At the very worst, even CGSMCMLXXV cannot claim more than a Forum Rules breach.
The chances of even this happening is truly remote as Kotrin has already looked through and applied penalties for Forum Rule breaches to the thread CGSMCMLXXV is talking about (see the penalty assigned to Xerfer in post #125 of the thread in question). https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1860133&page=6
Breathe easy my friend. CGSMCMLXXV is striking out in an attempt to divert attention away from his activities. He is merely entangling himself further in the briar patch.
Have Fun
Grunge | I had a long post here(with quotes and everything, who insulted who), but I decided to delete it all.
If Skunder and Pang were so calm to block it and forget about it, I will not be the one who digs up old filth from there. I have looked closely. None of the participants in that thread was nice and friendly. NONE. | CGS, if you don't feel comfortable when some people accuse that you cheat in this game, then ask Anita to stop paying full price for smith service.
I can compare your case with case of players who deliberately enter a combat with full arts while the game combat description say "Minimum arts".
Everybody knows that it is not against the rule, but people hate them and some will try to complain about them.
In my own opinion, maybe you are not legally wrong (admin will decide that) but you are definitely ethically wrong.
So if you insist to continue accept full "expensive" smith payment from other people, then you better start to get use that some people call you as a cheater. |
1|2Back to topics list
|
