About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
3:34
1403
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Off-game forum-->
1|2|3

AuthorWhat a noob's game!
To CGSMCMLXXV: Actually I am having a lot of fun. But you are right. I should get some off days from this game and I will but I just wanna make everyone notice their mistakes.

To MrNiceGuy: Can't help it. After all I am just a 14 years old kid.
This:

¤ Battle description violations – advertisement, flood, SHL etc. (anything unrelated to battle itself)
- first infringement, 1,000 gold
- second infringement, 5,000 gold
- third infringement = character block.
There is possibility of premature block in exceptional cases.


seems to contradict this:

We have no mandate and no rights to block people or to fine them for cheating or not respecting AP rules.


I think that not respecting AP rules falls under Battle description violations.
And still he did fine Kusika although he has no mandat.
I think that not respecting AP rules falls under Battle description violations.

You are wrong. Description violation means you put things with sexual, racist, etc. content in description.
NatureLord, perhaps you should read the rules again. Find the word "Instigation" to losing is forbidden. I too didnt know the exact definition here but I think lining your troops and not attacking for 10 moves can be part of "instigation to losing".
But which didn't bring any loss did it?
Instigation to losing a combat is also forbidden.

Its like talking to a wall.
You are wrong. Description violation means you put things with sexual, racist, etc. content in description.

In that case I am worng, sorry.

Now I've realized that Battle description violations can mean both "writing a description which violates the game rules" and "joining a battle with "wrong" AP, or otherwise not respecting the wishes of the description maker".

Sorry, it's ambiguous.
[Post deleted by moderator Kotrin // whoops.]
[Player banned by moderator Kotrin until 2009-09-16 17:13:16 // BTW, by cheating I meant "illegal transfers between multiple characters.".]
@gem85: too bad, for once the rule you mention is slightly clearer than average since it includes examples XD

¤ Battle description violations – advertisement, flood, SHL etc. (anything unrelated to battle itself)

Example of Battle description violations:
- "join #999 Last Number clan!! COME HERE"
- "Hey, I buy Elements for cheap"
- "fdgsdggffdsgsdgfdsgfdsgdsfdfsgsdggsggsddgd"
- "Have a look => www.myGreatClanWebsite.com"

Mentioning AP levels in battle description, no enchant, no diamond upgrades, only Dark Elves, etc. are related to battle itself, and do not constitute a violation.
For instigation, find a definition for example here:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/instigation

Instigation to losing means asking someone to lose to you on purpose.
To Kotrin:

That's my point. Secretary will never answer.
So what? In which way does it proves that messages aren't read?
Messages might be read but why don't they do anyhting for it? HUH?
#33

Nothing. Nothing proves that Secretary's messages aren't read. But more things point in that direction than the other. Ever heard about Occam's_razor? :)

However, it is still completely possible that Secretary's messages are read. But that case is still worse. That means that problems are known about, but not addressed. Not referring to the K. vs K. case this time.

Yet, I see no point in further arguing over this subject. We have come down to religious debates... :) (beliving in the existence of Secretary/not beliving in the existence of Secretary)
Personally, I had the words from Arctic than Secretary messages were read, and so is my Faith ^_^

But how many people here prefer pretending than Secretary messages aren't read instead of contemplating an even worse outcome - that their messages haven't been taken into consideration?
Wait a sec. This is not the reason why I opened this topic. I opened it because I think there are many cheaters in the game but forget it. I just want something to be done so that the game can still be as fun as it used to.
[Post deleted by moderator Kotrin // Don't quote swear words then!]
At least Admins make only one Tournament or something like that to spice up the game.
I totaly agree with Erekose. Noone ever does anything to help wright and punish wrong.
1|2|3
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM