| Author | Group battles. Afk problems |
|---|
alot of times when i enter a group battle it always ends up a 2 vs 1. because lots of times 1 of the players is afk. causing it to be unfair. i think that if 1 of the players is afk and kicked out of the battle. the battle should turn into a free for all.(or the battle should stop and all players get 100 xp or something)
Thank you for reading this. |
You need to level up...lower the level, the more afk...higher the level, much less afk :)
Or you can add non-afk fighters to your friends list..and try to organize PvP events like that.
No better solution at this time as far as I can tell.
Good luck! |
| also .. I suggest you not to do many PvP until you reach lev 7 ... and in any case, better EFO ... at least, you don't rely on anyone else there ... |
| It was cool if when a player afk another can join in his place... |
| hahaha....but that is not gonna happen...if the battle gets stopped why shud u get 100 exp for doing nothing....then no i'll play...they go AFK....come back after sometime....then go for other battle....go AFK again....in this way they'll be gettin' 100 exp for doing nothing....that'll be unfair....also....use thoughts a bit....then give them ideas....!!! |
please see here for a list of possible solutions for the afk probleme:
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1872170 |
It was cool if when a player afk another can join in his place...
Not really, cause then you would have players abusing it - example: your teammate plays really badly, so you ask him to AFK out in order for your friend to take his place and help you win. I'm not saying everyone will do it, but this isn't the point of PvP (having someone else play for you). I much rather fathom the idea of AI taking control of the already-penalized AFK'ers' troops, but that was on another topic.
About the main idea (battle being turned into an FFA or stopped): imagine you're entering a 2v2 with your friend in order to win together, how would you feel if one of your enemies goes AFK when he sees he's losing and you are then forced to fight each other? I'll tell you, it defeats the whole purpose of a GROUP battle (not to mention you 2 might have troops near each other, placed so that you protect one another, one of you would be at a serious disadvantage).
Overall impression on the main suggestion (posted by the topic owner):
-1 |
