About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
20:30
4792
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->
1|2

AuthorBlacksmith
well logically we should give resource rather than gold to repair equipment
agreed, but there would be no difference in cost. However it would require economic stimulation. so +1
maybe me would be able to use some resources and some gold
if repair cost 2k maybe we could use 10 ore and 150 gold (maybe 1 ore would be worth about 185 gold)
Thats just more work work for smiths.......,They have enough problems for training the guild already
-1
no its not more work...
its boost to economy
It means that all smiths will have to keep a good stock of resources and they will be adversely affected when any resource goes out of stock..Payment with gold is simpler..So why change.
Dont change somethings thats already working fine-
Some Guy
what about if using resources would be optional?
u can use resourec or gold... or both
Dont change somethings thats already working fine-


that's exactly the point: It is NOT working fine ... there are piles of resources you have no real use for ... plus, it is a lot more logic that you need steel to repair a sword, and wood for a staff, and things like that ... the resources, then, should be given by the person requesting the smith work, not the smith himself ... so he does not need any stock ..

all in all, a very nice idea (by the way, altready proposed a couple of months ago by Korzika and me in two other posts I am too lazy now to find)
But the thing is......A lot of people who get items repaired at lower smith levels do not have many resources, and also it makes payment to smiths more difficult.
For eg.Repair cost of steel sword-3 steel(Hypotheticaly)
Now please tell me what 15% of 3 steel is?
I agree that makes thing more complicated ... but also more realistic .. and will help a lot the economy w/o continuous intervention of adm to refill mines ... the cost to buy arts already consider some resources, this also should be enhanced, more resources should be needed. Regarding smiths that offer "money back", they can continue to do so ... if steel costs 500 gold, for example, they will ask 15% of the 500 gold and will take care to buy the steel themselves ...
So,Basically it all comes back down to just more work work for smiths
if you want to see it this way, then be it ...
if you want to see it this way, then be it ..
Maybe....If you tried to train smiths guild you would feel differently.
-1

i agree with evilskyterrorr's 4 post
Maybe....If you tried to train smiths guild you would feel differently.

i train smith guild
Maybe....If you tried to train smiths guild you would feel differently.

i train smith guild

Taking about OndaNera
you are level 0 smith guild... ...so you dont know much about smithing...

if we had a choice if we want tu use gold of resources or both this would be great
you are level 0 smith guild... ...so you dont know much about smithing...

if we had a choice if we want tu use gold of resources or both this would be great

I know enough to know that a complete switchover to resources is nothing but a headache.....A choice may not be that bad........
Maybe you can do it at a price with rersources and at a little bit higher price for only gold
i was thinking if we had a choice and resources can be used insted of gold where resources are worh a little more like they cost
ore = 186 gold
wood = 185 gold
.
.
.

in that way we would use more resoures and save some gold
1|2
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM