Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->
1|2
| Author | record button |
|---|
i always look at records from my lvl and i think there should be a try to beat the record button beside so an example I universal records I
Igargoyles 1238 tamid-mastulI try to beat the record?
i think that would be cool so say tamid mastul got a record and then i press try to beat the record and then i meet the same thing but 10 more
vn102
and this was an example from lvl 7 records i looked on | | If you want to beat a record you have to wait till you get to that point. That's what records are all about: Getting to the max and being able to beat that. It would be unfair if everyone would have the possibility to beat you easiliy. 10 more isn't much regarding, that after beating the creatures you will face 30% more the next time. | Nice idea but:
If you want to beat a record you have to wait till you get to that point. That's what records are all about: Getting to the max and being able to beat that. It would be unfair if everyone would have the possibility to beat you easiliy. 10 more isn't much regarding, that after beating the creatures you will face 30% more the next time.
So, just no. | | - First: One player may enjoy PvP more then others; he plays for fun, but is a master strategist who could beat one of the records; he doesn't manage to reach the record holder's amount of creatures because he levels up too fast; this makes the record remain the same, even though someone with the required skill and artifacts (he used them in PvP battles in my example) could have beaten it, if given the chance.
Yes, that is very good point. And this is the only true reason why I don't fight PvP anymore (but I would like to).
Another thing is that records aren't comparable, because:
1) the game rules changes
For example, after Talents were introduced it drastically changed everything.
Other example (a recent one): MH and GH amulets got +1 attack instead of +1 morale (it really makes a difference: a) for some battles you really need +1 morale instead of +1 attack; b) the new Necromancers got more power against the old Necromancers)
2) Diamond buyers get a huge advantage, especially those with Shrews in level 6 or 7.
Of course, it is acceptable, because in every online game players who pay real money get the advantage, but we understand that hunt records made by them aren't comparable. | 3) By the old rule you could get 1/3 and 2/3 of monsters, so some players abused this very well (like Zehir :) ) and they got many very cheap hunt points (it was +1 hgp AND +0.5 fsp for just 10-50xp and you could do that many times!).
So, they've got some monsters (which requires high HG level) being in low combat levels. So, obviously, those records aren't comparable.
4) In the old rules you could try the same battle many times and find the best strategy (or get that Luck on the first hit). Now you have to win on the first or second try, because otherwise you will level up. | 5) also there were a dirty rule: losing battles you could get 0.49 fsp and no xp, so some players (like Ethereality) intentionally lost thousands of battles and raised their faction skill much.
A hunt record made by high level Wizard or Necromancer (imagine +300 skeleton archers) on low combat level isn't comparable at all.
6) new Wizards are now much weaker than the old ones (mini-arts weakened).
So, hunts records made by old Wizards aren't comparable. | I forgot to say my opinion about this idea. :)
Yes, I agree with it, +1.
I think that you should be done this way:
1. You can specify how much you would like to kill, but if you specify more than in the 1st place on all factions table then it should be at least 10% more (similar rule for your faction).
For example, number of monsters:
All factions record 1st place: 100
Your faction record 1st place: 80
You can specify: 80, 79, 78, etc.
You can't specify 81, because 81 > 80 and 81 < 81*1.1 = 89.1
So, you can specify 90, 91, ..., 99, 100.
You can't specify 101, since 101 > 100 and 101<110.
So, you can specify 110, 111, 112, etc.
In this case
All factions record 1st place: 100
Your faction record 1st place: 92
you can only specify: 92, 91, 90, 89, etc. or 110, 111, 112, etc.
2. You get no experience, no hgp, no fsp if you DIRECTLY try to beat a record (no matter if you win or lose). This must be done to avoid abusers. For fast-leveling players there should be an option (on personal page) to receive xp (and some small amount of fsp, but no hgp) from such battles.
3. Remove requirement of high HG level for some monsters, because this way EVERYONE will get a chance.
4. All records should became OBSOLETE after some time (for example, after 3 months). I.e. nobody publicly will see your records after 3 months, unless they go you and look in your personal record table.
5. The records done by you should ALWAYS remain in your personal record table and that table should be VERY extended so that you could see your achievements on every level, including the history of your best position, i.e. if you ever was 1st in all factions then it should show "1st in all factions" (the same for each faction separately).
6. There should be also a separate record table for your assists (now we don'r have such table at all). And you should be able to make DIRECT tries to beat records too and all such battles should become obsolete too, but maybe after 6 months (players should be encouraged to fight together). | | i think it is a great idea | | good | | worst idea ever | worst idea ever
Worst comment ever. | | lol | | guys i think i agree with u 10 more maybe not a big diffrens but we can change the idea to be 30% more | | -1 | | -1 | | karsot u think bad cuz u have ladons and ghost record and khellendros u got sphynx warriors, lizard cavalry, giant lizards and it maybe was something more ofcourse u dont want any1 to beat u | I don't think so it is a good idea to give a chance to every player to have his own record coz records are not meant for that as this part will spoil : One player may enjoy PvP more then others; he plays for fun, but is a master strategist who could beat one of the records; he doesn't manage to reach the record holder's amount of creatures because he levels up too fast; this makes the record remain the same, even though someone with the required skill and artifacts (he used them in PvP battles in my example) could have beaten it, if given the chance.
N hunt records are the thing which you earn it by beating the maximum u can n facing 30% more next time, you actually deserve it n prove yourself by beating a monster each time.
But +1 to Robai's idea of getting some monsters below the actual HG level for example taking of level 7 only one player has attempted for mistress till today n any strategist player could take that out but the only thing stopping him is his HG level so this must be removed on some monsters | But +1 to Robai's idea of getting some monsters below the actual HG level for example taking of level 7 only one player has attempted for mistress till today n any strategist player could take that out but the only thing stopping him is his HG level so this must be removed on some monsters
TYPO it should be lvl 6 (Yippeekiay) | yes i have ghosts and ladons records (only 2nd place for ladons, but i'm trying my best to take the 1st place)
and i'm proud of them, because i worked very hard for them.
i waited for several weeks with 0.1* workhaholic penality in order to meet the right monsters...i fought them 1 time, and then i wait again, with workaholic penality since i met the next hunt with 30% increase...and then i wait again...i had to do it 4-5-6 times before having a number high enough to make the record.
if you want to break my records, you have to work harder than me.
it took severals months of work to make my hunt records, it would be totally unfair if someone could just come, and click on "record button" to break my records (or records of any other player).
and i don't say that only because i have some hunt records.
i'm level10 now, and obviously i don't have any records on levels 11+.
i'm planning to break some hunts records at these levels, but without clicking on "new record" button: it would be unfair for actual top hunters.
-1 to the "new record button"
-1 to the idea to make records obsolete after some time.
records should becomes obsolete if someone breaks them, that's all. if nobody breaks the records, 10 years later the old record will still be here, there is no reason to delete it.
+1 to remove HG level requirements to meet some monsters |
1|2Back to topics list
|
