About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
3:51
1288
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Ideas and suggestions-->

AuthorDes-legalize breach of combat description
I suggest (for our admins) to:

1. Remove clause 7. Combat description is just a request not obligation. And thus transgressing the combat description is not a violation of game rules. from https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1853328

2. Add the text of the combat description for Group Battles in the "Combat log", after the parties involved.

Reasons:
a) Disregard of combat description is a case of bad sportmanship that should be penalized.
b) Workaholic penalty drives many people to despearatly needing to win one combat, and many people will do anything for that, including joining min AP combats, with full (or close to full) arts.
c) Those who do so are wining a combat by cheating. According to https://www.lordswm.com/help.php?section=5, The rules are not created to oppress the players' rights and game possibilities, but to protect the game community from cheaters and louts. Hence, clause 7 is a loophole in the rules, and cheaters to take advantage of the community.
Problem: You can't prove that someone ignored your combat description.
Problem: You can't prove that someone ignored your combat description.
Yes, you can if suggestion 2 above is also implemented. You have the description and you can re-run the combat and check hero's stats. When somebody joins min AP with full arts or close, it will be obvious from his stats.
Closer he is to the AP requirements, harder will be to say. But also, the edge advantage he has is smaller.
i'll give you a little hint:
this will never happen due to exactly the same reason TGI leasings was never been legalized.
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM