| Author | 5V5 battles |
|---|
| what about 5v5 battles they would be alot more fun espicaly if its one clan againt another. |
| yes, if you want do spend 4 hours at one battle :) |
| lol they wouldnt take that long 3 vs 3 tke 15mins at most if ppl plan moves ahead |
| Don't we need 4vs4 before we get to 5vs5? :) |
we surely need an option that IaS`s topics can be created only from 12 lvl. then there`ll be less stupid suggestions.
3 lol. 3x3 in fullart on higher lvl can last for more than an hour. so 5x5 will last about 2+ hours. i dont need that kind of battle. |
Yeah, 9 AFK players would make it every fight to last even 10 hours or more :)
Moreover, the longer the fight the more chance of someone will go AFK. |
hi
[Player banned by moderator Barbarian-Fishy until 2010-10-02 15:58:19 // Warning - Off topic. Please post something that adds to the thread] |
| we need 4vs4 before we get to 5vs5 |
no there will be alot of confusion i feel 3 vs 3 is fine
just imagine if out of 6 5 r afk
n if they come back suddenly n after that........
waste of time too
-1 |
| -inf |
| better 100vs100 and 200 every one for onself if you winn you change s few levls |
| if it would be 5 vs 5, many people would need to stop after like 1.5 houres and then afk. i bet at least 9 out of 10 battles there will be afks |
| agree with thr aboves...a 3v3 for high levels takes more than 1.30 hours...Imagine a 5v5 >.< 4 hours + |
not really, 5v5 could even shorter than 3v3 in certain cases.
guess that 5 wiz vs 5 knight. so, once all wiz focus drop spells on 1 knight, it is almost wipe that knight out LOL
it wont take long to wipe all other as well XD |
For me, 5v5 is a bad idea because
1)It will waste a lot of time and most of the players might go afk due to this reason.
2)Some players will get confuse if they play this kind of combat |
