| Author | arena | 
|---|
			
| i think there should be arena to practice on and u can pick a creature to fight but if u want a fee then ill leave that up to you | 
| Topic moved from "General game forum" to "Ideas and suggestions". | 
| i think Keep Thinking....
 | 
| +1. You can choose the number of creartures, stacks, and even arrange the opposition's troops yourself, after which AI takes over. 
 Service would cost a certain amount of gold.
 | 
| + 1 | 
| Interesting idea...what about exp and fsp gain? Would that be like in normal PvE? Would there even be any exp/fsp gained from doing an 'arena battle'? | 
| XP/fsp for practice would defeat the purpose, so no. 
 There would also have to be some limitations as to what creatures are available as target practice... I mean, someone at combat level 4 or 5 shouldn't have access to fight the same tier 7 monster that can only usually be found by fighting your way to HG 6/7.
 
 Maybe limit it to the character HG level.
 | 
| I reckon that this would just be an easy way of getting xp but u shouldn't get fsp or any gold and it would cost cost gold to make otherwise 
 +1
 | 
| Training in the arena costs you gold, and gives you some exp but no fsp. Sounds intriguing :D 
 And would winning an arena battle relieve you of workaholic?
 | 
| +1 Training in the arena costs you gold, and gives you some exp but no fsp. Sounds intriguing :D
 | 
| And would winning an arena battle relieve you of workaholic? 
 No. Too easy.
 | 
| phfff. A battle in which I have to pay gold, gain no fsp, and gain exp. Not only do I waste gold, I also gain a very bad exp/fsp ratio. I would never join such a battle. On the other hand, if it relieves workaholic penalty, I would love to battle. Choose 1 skeleton/farmer, fight it, gain 1 exp, then enroll 11 more times. But since it doesn't relieve thw workaholic penalty, forget it. I see how this is usefull though, such as before a hunt, you could try doing this to see if you could win that hunt solo. Therefore, +1. This would be an extremely low piority though. |