| Author | Players taking on lower level player |
|---|
| I have started to notice in the PvP battles lots of players are setting their level requirements for their opponents to be far lower than their own. I am only level 3 but I have already seen 3 lvl 7s today who wouild be willing to take me on. what is going on? |
This is normal. They purposely set the games up to be in their favor.
For example:
A level 8 player setting up a game with the description 3+3+3 = 9 for a game where it's him vs 3 level 1-3 players. |
| yeah this is stupid. a lvl 8 can probably take on 3 lvl 6 players, but for some reason, they usually go for low levels, i think its just waste of time and arts, exp is not even that much |
its for fun ghost!
china_blue used to do it... |
| You'll also find 1vs1 battles setup this way. It's the way it is; some people just can't handle a fair fight. |
for coolahed:
what i meant was, it would be fun if it was lvl 8 vs three lvl 6's then it would be pretty much equal, but if its lvl 8 vs three lvl 's then the battle is decided from the start. no fun |
yeh...
you are probably ri8;) anywayz.. is there any faster way to gain fsp than TG? |
The whole reason why they put description of adding up the levels is because it doesn't work. 2 level 6 does not equal 1 level 12. They only use that math because the victims would think it's a fair fight.
for coolahed:
Yeah, it's called battling nonstop. :) |
| I didn't have time to fully explain in my first comment, but I have even seen it in the duals, I think it is because of the lack of players in the server. Three lvl 7's who are willing to take on lvl 3's? I don't get it, low exp, waste of durability and not a good look if someone sees it in the duals. |
| well i remember that battle with hewrin ( for fun ) me lik i think and goku, were fighting and thought we were going to lose, buy amazinly one |
I say it is worth it
Why?do 1 battle with min art the can destroy the penalty
thats it |
| ummm, is anyone forcing the lower levels to fight the higher levels? Like are they going to their houses and putting a gun to their heads, is a family member hostage unless they battle? Just curious, I do believe we humans have a thing called freedom of choice, at least in deciding to do battle with a much stronger opponent. Why make a issue of this...AGAIN,( I've been here since 2008 and so I've seen this thread made many times before). |
for Lucid-Naz:
Nope; you're right... but...
This is like Girl Scouts come along and sell you their overpriced cookies for $5 a box. You, a cookie price newbie, gets convinced by the little girls that the regular price is $6 when the regular price at the store is $3.
or....
The store sells a potion of oblivion for $5 with the original price being $10. You think it's a huge bargain with it being 50% off. But little did you know the store is actually paying only $1 to bring it in. |
| Think of the lowly noobs, who think that three level 3s = level 9, so they think they have a fighting chance in the fight, when they really don't have a chance. |
X = (X-2) + (X-2) or (X-3) + (X-3) + (X-3)
I like to use that general guideline.
X is the high level player.
X-2 means 2 levels behind.
Example:
X= level 9
then he should fight 2 level 7s or 3 level 6s. |
