| Author | I&S capital review |
|---|
Lords and ladies,
there were very many ideas in the latest months and many of them were very interesting and decent.
I would like to offer a review. Help us fish out the most interesting suggestions, sort them out for only the main statements and concentrate them in one thread.
As a payback from us, I personally promise to share our views on the most important and interesting ideas and suggestions, along with our decision of acceptance/denial to introduce them into game in future.
The Administration admits to have lost track of this topic around July, any serious and constructive suggestions since that time may be brought out in certain format.
Let us decide on the format. I would like to see them written briefly, not more than 10 sentences per suggestion, each in a new post. Judging on how many we gather, the administration will share their thoughts to certain number of them as promised. 2 days should be enough for the review.
Please keep the topic free of flood and with minimal off-topic discussions. I ask to take the local rules of I&S into serious consideration.
I reserve moderation rights of this topic exclusively to myself. |
| 1.If the CG group battle doesnt start due to not enough participants, they will be distributed to duels. If they have chosen the option allowing such distribution. It would give high level players a chance for a group fight, but in the same time would not force them into waiting 15 minutes for nothing to happen. |
Private Photo Albums
Implementation of this would bring more diversity and friendliness.PP Albums can only be viewed by Friends of that Lord, which can be important when you want to show something private to them. |
possibility to sell faction buildings on 80-90 precent of original cost this way you could chance faction in my case 80precent would mean over 100k lose per castle so i think its well priced. these new lgs and all i think this could be balancing and whining could be much less now you would need only 100k everytime you want to chance.
[Player banned by moderator Arctic until 2010-11-12 00:56:55 // http://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=843
2.13] |
CG points to be awarded to players who successfully defeat an ambush. This would serve 2 purposes: 1) increased rate of CG points awarded, which appears to be very slow at the moment; 2) the thief gets a reward so why not reward the victim too, for their tactical focus in overcoming an ambush.
Number of points awarded to be decided, suggest between 0.25 and 1 CG point |
@3
Private Photo Albums
Problem: You must friend people to have them exclusively help you in a Hunt. What if you just met someone, would like them to help exclusively, but don't want them to see your photos?
True, there could be yet another workaround for this... but it sounds like a bit of work for something not so pertinent to game content. |
| 5# problem here is min ap ambushers you would get points too easily |
[Post deleted by moderator Arctic // 1/2, 1/3, 2/3 on hunt not returning to LWM. But the Hunt record system will become advanced, providi]
[Player banned by moderator Arctic until 2010-11-08 15:50:02 // ng chance to set "Monthly records" and get some rewards for such records. //Player not guilty in rule violation.] |
| 6# in the same way that thieves get easy points against no AP victims and victims with 1 creature in their army. |
Offer a vanity title for diamond cost under the character's nick.
Example:
Modi
"King of Hate"
Players applying would have to be approved my admins(to protect from profanity) and have the diamonds already in their inventory, much like you would with gold when you register for a clan.
Make the cost reasonable with the idea that this easy addition can be a boon for admins if it is in reach of the common man/woman's budget. |
| 9 U cant ambush 10 such victims daily (actualy last time i met some1 with no troops was 6 months ago). while thief hunting u can ambush even 20 thiefs scoring 20 easy wins a day. CG has to be for fair combat against evenly matched oponents not for easy wins... |
| Offer a license to hunt undead in the mines for a diamond cost. Using those undead monsters we only see once per year, like frankenstein, players would enter the mines and wait as you would a regular hunt. |
Create an underground with a gauntlet of monsters, where you can't heal and must break through to fight a boss monster at the end.
Create a treasure chest with your reward inside that the character opens for added flair. |
| 9 perhaps the amount of CG awarded could be related to the arts worn by both players, in the same way as xp and fsp in pvp |
| 14 it would work only if u get 0 CG for 48 AP player eg. same as CG restriction where u cant fight unless u wear atleast 48 AP for lvl 15. |
| this just popped on my mind some kindly renting "market" example you are going offline for night you could put arts if you want on rent on the rent market this way we wouldnt need to update forums all the time or send sorry were offline before receiving your mail again you could shape this idea but i really think it could be great.same for renters i were looking like crazy enchswords on forum at end of lvl 12 but nobody werent online so you cant do anythink would be good if i could get these arts no matter is someone online.items here would still take you own inventory room and you could withdrawn them from market any time you want. |
| i support sry's idea no. 3. also we can have a status update so that if we are online but afk others can know what we are doing or why we are not replying to his posts.. |
| small error in previous post i meant 0 CG for less then 48AP wearing thief. |
This just came up on my mind:
Sometimes im tired of finding partner to help me hunt..How about implement this features into MG..This features is to let us hire some MG troop to assist you to hunt
Of course the costs would not cheap..but need some sort of balances |
15
That's reasonable, you have to be wearing the min AP at your level needed for a PvP CG game. And then the CG points awarded are related to the AP value of both players. |
