| Author | Afk in pvp |
|---|
| Afk in PvP matches should have more severe consequences even if opponent dosent report you Like ban for entire day after 2 afks and ban for a week after 3, permantly ban after 5 no Matter wat. incase of internet loss an ally should take over. |
| How can you ascertain whether it was a connection loss or deliberate afk? Suppose I am going to lose and I pull out my broadband cable? |
Well in most cases actually if u r afk from start u lost connection most of the time.
And if u go afk at the end of halfway through then u can tell that its on purpose. |
| ban after 5 play bit more and eventually thats gonna happen on everyone |
| And if u go afk at the end of halfway through then u can tell that its on purpose.where is proof of that, if i get bored to bad teammates or overenchanted enemy i just shut down window and not care about it so how you proof it wasnt lost of connection? |
| Idea practically impossible... |
| Live with it,like all of us do.. |
Idea practically impossible...
Agree. |
at lev1-3 in every single group battle there are several people AFK.
I think if they instantly get banned, this would discourage a lot of new players.
(but waiting on others to time out is not good either, heh, forfeit button and then computer will take over ) |
some players go afk because of disconnection, not at will.
you should punish the internet instead. |
WHy not letting PVE take over after someone is AFK? Then its not a waste of armor/fight and makes it less dramatic for teammates :).
Same in Thief, if one goes AFK, PVE would take the army over, at least you would have a fight instead of wasting armor and money. |
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1894512
39. Toughen penalties for AFKing in combats. |
| closed by StevieGerrard (2013-02-15 00:31:53) |
|---|
