| Author | Canceling 'Chatting' During 'EveryOne For One Self' Battles ! |
|---|
Canceling 'Chatting' During 'EveryOne For One Self' Battles !
To Prevent Making Unions Between The Players !
It's Really Annoying !! |
+1
I'm genuinely surprised that this is my opinion... It not not illegal for players to make teams so long as they were made during the match, but it seems unethical. This would solve a massive annoyance within the game... |
Yeah
In Addition .. This Is The Main Reason That Makes Players Insult Each Others and Eventually To Hate The Whole Game ! |
| Btw .. Are These 'Ideas and Suggestions' Really Taken Into Consideration oF The Game's Supervisors ?? |
| +1 |
+/- 1
BUT people will start to PM each other to fix teams before the game starts. This will be even worse for you as you wouldn't know of their teams and if you haven't formed a team before via PM , you can't later as well .
It also takes away the possibility of manipulating people's actions during the course of the game. Winning Eofo is also much about the stuff you speak during the game which definitely has a psychological effect on others.
It has pros and cons. |
| mmmmm u r right... canceling the chat will reduce the problem by 80% |
| This is already possible by creating a 'blindfold battle' but even with this you will most likely face 'teams' as people join together on purpose and/or are talking to each other using an external chat system. |
| -1 if you're in a situation that you need help, then chat's your best friend. But I think it's in the rules that you can not enter a FFA teaming with someone untill the end for no reason. |
| #9 .. So Now If I Would Play a Battle .. and Players Make a Union Before It Starts .. Can I Report it .. Will They Got Punished ? |
| If you want to be very technical, EOFO matches are NEVER referenced in the official rules, even though it has been posted by the admins that teams formed during the match are legal. |
#9
How are you gonna prove if any player has already formed a union? You cant call it a union if a player chooses to attack you and not the person closer to him/her. And it will always be his choice to choose an opponent in a game like EOFO, admins just cant take away that liberty as the name "every one for oneself" suggests.
Since its an eofo, and the chat will be disabled , there's not a tiny bit of chance to prove any existing unions. Just think , HOW? :) |
| Sorry my last message was for ElvishW #10. |
You may make temporary alliances in a All for all Battle, but not a constant alliance.
I only say this because i have seen mods and admins say it. |
#10 without chatting their alliance will quickly .. crack :D
let's just say that my whole suggestion is pointless .. but something must be done abt it :/ |
| no. that's what blindfold GBs are for. it's exactly the same as a everyone for oneself, but names are hidden and there is no chat. |
| 8. Temporary treaties in 'Everyone for oneself' (or Blindfold battles) are not forbidden. If two or three players unite for eliminating the fourth - it is not a game rules violation. But consider that this rule does not permit participating the same combat with additional characters or from one computer |
Winning Eofo is also much about the stuff you speak during the game which definitely has a psychological effect on others.
-1 |
