| Author | Random Thoughts |
|---|
| Demons are not popular enough, so lets make their altgrade overpowered, yeah !! |
| Wish I could get Gambler's Guild points from Roulette ... |
| You know something's wrong when the hero with the most spell-caster-troops in his army is a bloody barbarian !! |
can our post here be totaly unrelated to game or flow of the ..
damnn, what was I thinking (scratching his head) |
At level 54, wizard can get all the talents possible. For PvP, my choice would be NO "wisdom", "Mana recovery", "Arcane revelation", "Dominion of frost", "Magical ematiation", "Seething anger", "Fireproof", "Dominion of wrath".
Fury Barbarian can get all the talents possible at level 40. My choice would be NO "Tactics", "Weighty Weapons", "Archery", "Concentration", "Stand your ground", "Last breath", "Endurance".
Sorry selfist, but people become selfish when they sell fish. |
Oh, I came up with a funnier one :
A man with selfish fists, does not sell fish |
for Lord Hallion91:
So funny :D |
Wish I could get Gambler's Guild points from Roulette ...
Me too ... have thinked of that :P |
| Why don't they introduce an Alt... They should do it after this tourny. |
| ) |
| Damn, I just saw that concentration doesn't work on tribal goblins. I was hoping for some hunting abuse before they realise it, but it seems I'm late ;P |
| I hate clicking on MG while travelling or clicking pass by hunt and MG right away and then I can't see the reward I got ... |
| The brain, the internet, the universe all have similar structures. If the computer understands and simplifies everything to binary then is it possible that human thought process at some point be simplified to just True or False situation? Is it the problem of this choice that created freewill? :O |
| You made my topic hard dude. |
is it possible that human thought process at some point be simplified to just True or False situation
I don't think so.. Brain has several parts. The emotional part and the thinking part always work simultaneously in all humans, although not with the same effectiveness, as it varies with situation and past experiences of particular person. Thus, the thought process is much more complex.
Just because the computer simplifies everything and you think its structure is similar to human brain doesn't give any rational basis to believe the same for thought process. It simply doesn't have the components of a human brain, and all the computer parts have been compulsively related to human brain by the likes of you and me.
I'd rather say the process is quite the opposite, it starts as complex with all the chemical and sensory interaction and then we simplify it to make a resultant decision.
P.S. This is pretty basic, and not nerdy. |
for Lord Hallion91:
What is that supposed to mean? :$
for virtual_vitrea:
Seriously, what is that supposed to mean? :$
P.S. This is pretty basic, and not nerdy.
Yeah, right! xD |
for virtual_vitrea:
And I think it starts as complex and refines to basic. You are right that chemical and sensory interactions are complex but as far as I know they are mere electrical signals to brain transferred via neurons. And I think if we go even further then in those signals there may be lots of 0s and 1s flowing giving rise to complex structures on a macroscopic level.
And seriously everything starts as basic and then moves to complex. Thats the rule of the universe and not believing in that'd mean believing in creation. oO
I am more of Darwin's fan. xD
And I do believe this will how we may advance in future.
For eg - Mapping our thought process and modifying it to derive complex theories (M theory etc) |
please stop the complex theories :P
it looks like it is just out of some program on discovery science :O
anyways barbarians must get the first blood talent!! >:( |
for harddude:
What caused these "mere electrical signals" and what determined thier functionality and effect in itself holds much more complexity, something that can't be pegged to a word like "mere." Even though these electric signals are similar to the 0s and 1s in their transit, our brain itself can't read them as if there's a pre-determined result based on it.
What i'm saying is the same electric signal generated in our neurons can cause several variables in terms of the result. Its influenced and controlled by more factors than just that.
If you ask me the existence of involuntary and subconscious functions contradict our logic of what we refer to basic. Adaptive interference to stimulus and constantly altering reception of our surroundings largely contributes to our thought process and i wouldn't be wrong to say it just reflects the complexity.
When you say ''everything goes from basic to complex'' there has to be a reference. Its almost like saying nothing goes to basic from complex. While i agree with your concept, but the way you put it against me; that i do not agree with. |
aman please!!
stop the theories!! @>@ |
