| Author | change of disparity for commoner events |
|---|
during the events which are created for more players to enjoy, what is the use of setting limits such as " only shop artifacts allowed"?
'most' of us rather be hunting and doing mg rather waste lots of gold on arts especially if u are a low level player and always purchase from the market for its low cost availability.
U can atleast change it to "atleast 5 shop artifacts"... for each battle.
Let the poor guys have fun too.
TBH in this week's survilurg's fort event, atleast 46 ap was needed (for lvl 11) and the amount of gold as a prize for winning a round was only 505. Whereas the amount of gold spent to get 46 ap was minimum 1750 per battle. :(
Despite the exp.pts and very very rare looting what is the use of playing then, if there is not much fun due to lavishly spoiling yourself with shop artifacts?
Might As Well Take Out The Shop!
~sid
Sincere request to the Admins and the mods to kindly make it easier for the poorer players to play. |
Sid, in competitive events it is necessary to limit players to standard ammunition. Any more disparity outside faction advantage would only lead to more unfair rewarding at the end of it.
Perhaps they could add an option that a player can choose to play non-competitively in exchange for a free-for-all style access. Even if he/she end up scoring very well using what ever gear they can, their records would be considered exclusive of the achievement of standard participants. This is the only acceptable form of suggestion I could think of. |
-1
I would love to use my full temporal set, but I am really bored to read the topics that will be created after about how unfair this is for the poor people because rich people can buy or already have everything.
I won't mind to give it a plus if you don't mind after the balance and equality are lost. :P |
-1
If you have a gold problem, then enrol more. ;)
A lot of the events you aren't supposed to make a profit, though there are some where you may (pirates/caravans). Why would anyone bother buying the expensive/high level shop arts if we didn't have events like this? |
Again and again, events are a luxury and intended for the financially stable characters and not for making profit. I don't know who the "most" of us are, but I sure as hell hate hunts or MG and if I could I would not even do any of them since they're boring contrast to events (even if it's repetitive, there's always some things new in every event) but for the sake of having a balanced FSP, only then I need to engage in hunts, etc.
Event shall and must always be played only in shop arts otherwise where's the competitiveness and fairness amongst players? |
I too would like a better set of opportunities to use the arts that I have got from events etc - I am loathe to get rid of them - but have no worthwhile situation to use them.
However this was my choice - they were useful when I did survilurg battles -but decided not to be in a military clan for a bit.
However the use of non standard arts into events ends up as a pay to win scenario - when there is the reward for the top players in the event to get some form of reward (extra art)
With non shop arts allowed - these winners would actually come from the rich not the poor - contrary to your suggested reasoning.
For your case what you really need is
a) a lower AP limit - maybe - but not a lot less if at all
b) use a cheaper set - this should be easily achievable - I am level 14 and my full art set is cheaper than what you describe - for sustainable full art battles consider the sub optimal good arts for your level - in my case I use mostly use obsidian arts - for your level I think the courage ones may be the equivalent (I am not sure as have never used this set as passed this level before their introduction)
I would however welcome the occasional different event which you could use any arts - I remember one before the merge where you had to battle through a dungeon - carrying on your remaining troops and mana to the next fight. Potentially facing a boss at the end (ringleader?), to get to the end you basically had to have some arts equipped. This was good and induced me to get my first enchants (only to never use them again as this scenario did not occur again :(
The critical thing though is a trade off - if you allow all weapons then you should not get a reward for being the best in the event as you could pay for that advantage - so should be a minority of events - perhaps only ones where the Empire is really threatened so anything goes as victory the only thing that matters - consequently the reward is then even for all - so balance is maintained.
Overall however, while I have sympathy -1 |
| i would just be for allowing hunter arts. Easy to get, available to all, and that would rewamp the market for them :) |
Sincere request to the Admins and the mods to kindly make it easier for the poorer players to play.
beeing poor in RL may not be persons fault.
beeing poor in this game is definitely players fault.
come on, LG 4 at CL 11. yet complaining about gold deficiency to play events.
events are equavalent of going out to drink, having fun in a movie theatre, a concert etc etc.. most of such expenditure is not affordable by the very poor in RL.
game lives on donations.
yet, admins do not expect all players to donate (= to have income = have a job) which help game directly.
those who cant donate are expected to invest personal time, enroll a lot, increase online count hence indirectly help the game. |
yeah but they can atleast, decrease the ap requirement per combat level. It is not possible to fight in this event without atleast having a lvl 9 set and if not make standard sets for each level rather than 1 weapon for 5 combat levels.
BTW
why isn't there introduction of 'buy full set' like obsidian set and flame set in artifact shop?
that way, they can reduce the costs of buying individually and can also sell more number of artifacts.
There are endless possibilities to this |
I don't think they would sell more artifacts by having a buy whole set button because people buy pieces of armour when they need to, more often caring about necessity than cost.
Buy full set may not be too popular since different pieces of armour have different durability values and people may choose to mix different pieces of armour sets for cheaper full AP sets. |
well there can be some additional bonuses for buying sets.
pieces of armour when they need to, more often caring about necessity than cost.
that is why art lease is there.
they can lease maybe an art individually for a certain amount.
but when they lease sets from the shop, they not only get bonuses but also it comes at a cheaper rate than having to individually select arts. |
but also it comes at a cheaper rate than having to individually select arts.
Leasing arts is more expensive than just purchasing from the shop and holding onto it for the events. That's what a lot of players do, I have a full arts set in my inventory which I use for events/WG.
It actually says -
Note that the lease cost per combat exceeds actual artifact price by 40%. Commission for unused combats is 10%. Lease term - 180 days. |
-1 for reasons stated above.
If you have a gold problem, then enrol more. |
