About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
18:51
4606
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->General game forum-->

Tomb of The Sun


<<|<|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14

AuthorTomb of The Sun
recharge good luck with that with Leg sucking up all the LG gold
since you only join if you have enough gold.

Hmm i don't see why people should sit out events just because the game doesn't have any decent methods to earn gold / always hold expensive events.
I'm still hoping for a min AP event although the chances of that happening are very slim.
Damn,12 attempts to pass lvl 50 :(

Victories / Combats: 50 / 77
Total points: 27885, available: 1460
Clan points: 50
Nice challenging event compared to smugglers.I feel that the sphinx should be removed as some factions might not be able to kill it.
Actually we need FFA events like old ringleaders
i know many are not happy with shop arts only trend
I disagree with you Miles.
Fair enough, it is opinion, you are allowed.

I also forgot to mention that the fact that you can enrol on a phone also means that people on average should find it easier to enrol more than may have previously been the case, again contributing to a general increase in average wealth of the population.

In terms of game set up, I think there likely to be little strong evidence to suggest that over time there is greater opportunity of gaining gold, and that the changes that they have implemented have allowed this.

Equally it is probably equally true that there are more opportunities of spending gold than their used to be.

Which of these two dominate is subjective and not going to be universally true for all.
Whoops didn't check properly, what I meant wasIn terms of game set up, I think there likely to be little strong evidence to suggest anything other than that over time there is greater opportunity of gaining gold, and that the changes that they have implemented have allowed this
Your latter message is actually harder to understand than what you said in #206, especially this part:

I think there likely to be little strong evidence to suggest anything other than that over time there is greater opportunity....
I know too many clauses and double negatives. My innate written style is overly verbose, especially if I'm rushing(which I was), and then correcting my message meant I had to add something in, making it even worse.

How about this.

I think people will mostly agree that over time there have been more opportunities to gain gold
Victories / Combats: 59 / 70
Total points: 29558, available: 865
Clan points: 50
Victories / Combats: 111 / 124
Total points: 45996, available: 286
Clan points: 50

I farmed the entire first 30 levels which made the last 20 levels an easy breeze. Those complaining about the difficulty should do the same and farm a bit.

Also it would be an improvement if all on the same combat level would face the exact same AI armies, to remove discrepancies.
For example here is my lvl 40:
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?lt=-1&warid=951573676&show_for_all=fed38bc8c6
and here is player Magdonald's lvl 40:
https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?lt=-1&warid=951670348&show_for_all=c85ce88399
Darkelf faction seems to face a bit more meaty AI version, could be a coincidence ofcourse, but still this makes the battles illogical when compared thus resulting into faulty data for analysis.
Also it would be an improvement if all on the same combat level would face the exact same AI armies, to remove discrepancies.


All at the same level and combat faction face same enemy
@Meshy, as you can see from my given example of me and Magdonald, both at combat level 18, we do not face the same army.
for Lawton:
Because you had different factions.

Same faction, level and same combat level gives same enemy. It would not be fair to give a charmer elf and a dwarf the same enemy for example.
Different classes have different enemies too, I face different enemy composition on same levels with classic wiz and BW.
Was it like that on other similar events?
@Meshy, why would it not be fair for all factions to face the exact same AI army? Would this not make it fair and square for all?
If it is the case that the AI army gets upped for certain factions then someone should tell us which faction gets the least AI army size so next time we can all play that faction instead.
@chakkal2001, nobody knows for sure. For example at robbers event after a loss I would keep getting a completely different AI army setup when redoing that exact same level and option, so it was random at every redo. But during this current event you get the exact same AI army setup after a loss when choosing the same option thus giving you the advantage of positioning your army.
why would it not be fair for all factions to face the exact same AI army

Because different factions have different strengths and weaknesses?
@Meshy, yes, but all the factions are balanced out to be able to fight one another. If every faction needs a different AI army size then this would mean that the factions are out of balance.
for Lawton:
That's not really true, if the enemy was slow and bulky then DE is great, but if the enemy has a lot of shooters then dwarf is great.

A bit like how a chaos wiz will usually beat a slow faction like Tribal , but lose quite often to a charmer elf type faction.
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
<<|<|4|5|6|7|8|9|10|11|12|13|14
Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM