Forums-->Queries and help-->
| Author | Even battles |
|---|
I can't work out what "Evenly" means when you're making a challenge. The battles I've been looking at have been less even than "Randomly" arranged ones. For example, I've just fought a battle in which I made the challenge: 1-2 on each side, Evenly. The battle was actually arranged with two level 1s on one side and two level 2s on the other.
I've also noticed that "Evenly" almost always (always in my experience, using three characters from levels 1 to 5, but I'll say "almost" to cover myself") puts all the bowmen on one side.
When I was playing another character I raised this in another part of the Forum, but a mod immediately locked the thread, not allowing discussion, because he said I was wrong and was basing my claim on a couple of experiences. I've no idea why he said that, as it's certainly not true; I'm basing it on many, many experiences,
Does "Evenly" in fact work in some oher way than the obvious? Is the evenness to do with some factor other than level or nature of the sides fighting? | | 'Even' battles mean that players join battle in turns - 1 for first team, then 1 for second, then 1 more for first team, another one for second. That's all evenness there is to it. | while random is random the server randomizes the teams
though in even when each team has 1 1 playe rthe next 3rd person gets opition between the two teams the fourth goes in the remaining team and similarly for fifth and sixth player if 3 vs 3 | | 'Even' does not mean the lvls (that is up to the players that join) it is like what shebali said and it will start even if not completly full with people. as in an optional battle it will only start when all players have joined and the players can pick what team the want for instance one team can be completely full and the other team hav no one on it yet. | | So - as with other parts of the game - the English is wonky. I did offer to help with it (it's obviously been written by people whose first language isn't English, so no shame to them), but I was ignored (which is shame to them). | | Sorry, I should also have said "thank you" to the people who answered me. |
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
Back to topics list
|
