Forums-->Queries and help-->
| Author | Restrictions on additional characters |
|---|
I'm a bit puzzled by all the restrictions on second and third characters. I can more or less see the point of banning transfers between them, but what's the reason for not otherwise allowing people to have more than one independent, fully fledged character? It's so unusual in the games that I've experienced, that it's not surprising if people don't realise that there are so many things that they're not allowed to do.
I can see reasons on the other side, though (for example, I'd have thought that someone prepared to spend money on one character would be prepared to spend money on others if they had full status, but not otherwise).
Am I missing something? | what's the reason for not otherwise allowing people to have more than one independent, fully fledged character?
People never do wat u say.Char's created with smae E-mail are mutls .
but no one hasmore than one independent, fully fledged character
so answer is simple. Admins know this and so there are restrcitions. | | mainly to prevent assisting | | But there are rules against such assistance; if people break those they can be banned. I still don't understand the other rules restricting what subsidiary characters can do. | | Additional char's are only made to know abt other factions better. | IMO,
Additional Character is created for testing how to play another faction.
That's why we are not allowed to play additional char as a independent character.
I think all of us will not feel convenient if someone has 3 personalities.
Today he talk to us as PlayerA, one hour later he join our clan as PlayerB, a day later he post in forum as PlayerC. | what's the reason for not otherwise allowing people to have more than one independent, fully fledged character?
People never do wat u say.Char's created with smae E-mail are mutls .
So, if I use another mail to create a char it's not a multi? O_o
but no one hasmore than one independent, fully fledged character
Not true. I know of quite a few people who had several independed chars and who were hurt by new rules.
Truth be told, only explanation I can give for such harsh rules concerning multi is that admins for some reason dislike them. They probably have their reasons, but it's not somethinng I know of.
Some of multi rules are all good and well, like posting on forum only with your main, but others just don't make sence to me. You can't rent TGI with multi, and you can't buy it. So you have to buy TG entrance with diamonds - but you can't sell TGI s you get. You also can't repair thief artifacts you get.
Ironicaly, it's fair players who are hurt most. Others will simply aquire couple of kid brothers/sisters, friends who play from same PC... | Yes, there seems to be some confusion about what I'm asking. What I want to know is why we can't have more than one character, able to do everything except support each other (with help in battle, make transfers, etc.)?
It's the stuff that Shebali mentioned that I don't understand. It can't hurt anybody - or the game - if I have two characters each of whom rents TGI, etc. So, as I said, I can understand not letting one person have characters that help each other, but not the rest. Can it just be that the developers or admins dislike them? That sounds irrational; I'm sure that there must be some reason that I haven't thought of. |
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
Back to topics list
|
