| Author | lvl 11 3vs3 |
|---|
There are more than 100 lvl11 players. But you barely saw any 3v3 game about lvl11. Why is it?
Lets make a poll.
Which kind of 3v3 lvl11 game u prefer?
A) Full arts, enchant no limit
B) Full arts, 40% enchant
C) Full arts, no enchant
D) minimal arts.
Personally, I dont mind ABC, but wont choose D because 5k-6k exps for 1 hour battle kinda of time waste.
Choose one. Lets make some 3v3 games. Otherwise this game is dead.
Indeed, I hate last minute duel in 3v3 game because it is unfair for gamemaker since the opponent will choose a sharp strategy against gamemaker's gear and talent build. Most case, gamemaker just lose. |
Good post! I'm a new level 11 and I would like to have some good 3vs3 battle too.
If I have to choose, I'll say "C". I'm ready to buy a full unenchanted set if needed, cause I have lot of low-enchanted artifacts. |
Im not level 11 but the best 3vs3 are "B"
Its even that way |
| D |
| Topic moved from "General game forum" to "Off-game forum". |
for MasterTI:
I've seen 40% enchant many times in battles of the top players. Help me Understand one thing.
It is:
- 1 weapon with up to 40% enchantment or
- maximum bonus of 40% in enchanted artefacts?
I will NEVER buy a weapon enchanted up to 40% from another weaponsmith cause I am "drinking my blod" to reach a good level in weaponsmith. But I can reach 40% bonus adding many artifacts together.
Even "B" is good for me in the second way. |
| up^ |
I like D. Probably because it's best for demons and barbarians. No defense, we pwn. :D
Agh Vonemar you're 11 too. Good thing I'm pretty close now. :D |
| How about a compromise. Lets say C. Will you join? |
| I'd join a C. I'm not yet level 11 though, about 95k exp to go. 3 days max. |
| ^ |
for Vonemar:
Enchantments on a single weapon are added
Enchantments from multiple sources are additive multiplied if similar
Say E10 on a sword, E10W10 on a left hand weapon and W10 on a Bow
That's 100%-(100%-10%)(100%-10%) = 19% Earth and 100%-(100%-10%)(100%-10%) = 19% Water
Yes, you can have E10 on sword, F10W10 on a Dagger and A10 on Bow, that's 40%, but then the cost of doing that isn't different from having E10F10A10W10 on a single weapon.
But having E10F10A10W10 on the sword, E10F10A10W10 on the dagger and E10F10A10W10 on a bow
That's 100%-(100%-10%)(100%-10%)(100%-10%) = 28% each element = 4x28% = 112% more damage
Maybe I don't understand your plan. If so, sorry. |
for Takesister:
I already know what you wrote, but thanks ;-)
My plan is to grow as weaponsmith and help my clan mate to grow with the other 2 enchanter's class. If I use my gold and my elements to obtain a +40% sword from another enchanter, as I'm not rich, I strongly slow down mine and mate's growth. That's the plan! ^__^
Thanks again, "B" and "C" are good for me. |
So far,
A 1
B 2
C 2
D 1
need more opinions |
| I enjoyed the 11ap max battles at level 10, they were fun, at level 11 I've yet to do any (major) group battles as there aren't any up most of the time, haven't really done full art battles so cant really comment |
| ^ |
| B & D |
| C & D |
ah.. double post.
well, enhanced art only show how rich you are. although you can get element from MG, but it doesnt mean you can always get the elements you need. hence, enhanced art can consider as luxury for those rich ppl :)
if you are fighting with skill, no enhanced art is always better. if you are showing your wealthy, pls use max enhanced art, 40% extra dmg DO change the result of a battle alot |
| C & D |
