Forums-->Queries and help-->
| Author | No troops on travelling = intentional loss? |
|---|
some players trevel without troops, to don't give exp and skill to thieves
i thought: isn't it intentionall loss? when you travel you always have chance to fight, so if you bring only 1 recluit it's like you want to lose
it's unfair, to ambush thieves spend tons of money in arts
and those players make them wasting 1 of durability for 1 exp and 0,16 skill, you only get an easy thief point ( that is unfair too, I'd like to fight for them, there is no ability in defating a farmer, too easy)
tell me if i'm right or wrong
i consider bringing no troops should be punished with some penality, | | Thieves get a free TG point. It's not an intentional loss, because the ambushed player never agreed to fight in the first place. | | With that thinking travelling with no or minimum arts is just like it, as you surelly will lose to a full arted player. And many players don't have time to waste as they have to make it in time to complete their MG quest or they are just bored of fighting thieves, so I see no harm done travelling with no troops. And btw if they travel with no troops you may not get much xp but you get a lot of fsp :) | it's unfair, to ambush thieves spend tons of money in arts
u should change ur point of view | it's unfair, to ambush thieves spend tons of money in arts
You're robbing people, and you call it unfair? |
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
Back to topics list
|
