| Author | Top Warior selection |
|---|
I see that top warrior selection is based total exp.
This is not represents the true skill of a player. Player who has played this game for years with few percentage of victory (means not too good in battles) will never be beaten by some player who has played for months but with higher victory percentage (very skillful in battle).
So, i suggest a new formula for selection of top warrior:
Final score= victories/defeats * combats fought
With this formula, a newbie player wont showed up in top warrior ranks, and a middle player (has played for months) will have a chance to show up in top warrior ranks.
How bout it?
Thx^^ |
| http://guildofheroes.ru/lords.php |
what do you mean?
it is only a table of players we can sort as we want.
i am talking about ranks which show up in a table with title "TOP WARRIOR". It's honor to be in that table.. |
higher victory percentage =/= very skillful in battle as anyone with decent TG score will tell you :)
Level up. Top-100 ends with lvl 12 - hardly unreachable ;) |
One with higher victory percentage doesn't mean that he is better than one with less victory percentage. It depends on combat level too.
At low level, you can easily have 90% or more winning ratio. But as you level up, it is very hard to keep that ratio. Especially when you have to fight caravan or high level Mercenary Quest / Hunt. |
it is only a table of players we can sort as we want.
That's why it's so useful. You see, there are TONS of classifications for "top players". Some are fine with total Exp (the admins, for example). Others like you think the win/loss ratio should be taken into account. I'm sure for some the highest wins at roulette is the deciding factor...
The best of both worlds is just to have a full player list, then sort it out the way you want! ;) |
| He said the list of top player is base on their combat win and lose maybe... |
| It already excists, so no new idea. Topic closed. |
| closed by FaithBringer (2009-11-23 17:52:28) |
|---|
