| Author | a more honest tournament |
|---|
| i dont know if this was posted again and i know its too late as the tournament heads to its end but i think that most clear and honest rule , so nobody will complain about underground allies , is to enter the north vs south parameter and then free |
| That would of made the tournament quite interesting...a lot more than it is now. |
3 vs. 3. 20 fights. Each winner gets 1 point, loser 0. No same team twice.
Just an example. How nice and easy would that be? |
all the 3 players of the team (north or south) will get 2 points and the final winner (after free parameter is activated) 3.
so teamwork gets more important as the winning teams trophy is 66% percent of total winner prize(2 points out of 3)
losers gets a big zero |
How nice and easy would that be?
it would be harder than teaming up. so, it would be bad for you |
it would be harder than teaming up. so, it would be bad for you
What is the easy part about this whole teaming up in your opinion? |
it would be bad for you
Also, I have noticed you havent played this tournament once, so you have precisely what idea about what is going on there? |
Easy. Blindfold battle, no two members belonging to the same MC, and you still count as being in the same MC if you left it less than one month ago.
Problem solved |
Problem solved
What about clans that are not military clans. Arent they in advantage then? I have see such teams too. |
i agree with last_one-alow team work wasn´t very good idea
it changes charakter of this tournament |
#6
if you find 4 vs 1 vs 1 not easy, how hard would 3 vs 3 be for you? |
if you find 4 vs 1 vs 1 not easy, how hard would 3 vs 3 be for you?
believe it or not elite warriors still get teamed up on contrary to what everyone says in the forums still, teaming up together is just a way to avoid this (as it's no fun if we just don't team up and then just get ganked ourselves) |
believe it or not elite warriors still get teamed up on contrary to what everyone says in the forums still, teaming up together is just a way to avoid this (as it's no fun if we just don't team up and then just get ganked ourselves)
As flawed an excuse as I have heard one.
So basically, you admitted "it's no fun" to be teamed up against, but in >80% of the fights I have seen EW players filled up the top 2-3 places (3-4 where they even took the 4th spot as well), the other players are either not in a clan, or of different clans(!).
So you are justifying your clan's rampant teaming actions with the few isolated cases where some members of your clan was team against?
Your statement (unless one is poor in his understanding of the English language) implied that, "we teamed up coz others were doing it first. As it was no fun to be teamed against, we started teaming up too to avoid getting ganked.".
That's as far from the truth as Heaven and Earth. Lemme quote you from another thread,
Well, except for the fact that they conveniently forgot to mention that in many of the battles I saw, the rest of the players either don't belong to any clans or are of different clans (like the example you posted), and they still teamed up from start to end(!). I wonder which part of the 'temporary' in "temporary alliance" don't they understand..
And before you start with more excu.., I mean reasons to justify your clan's blatant teaming, note that I joined one of the first battles on the very first day of this tourney, and your clan mate OPENLY admitted they were teaming. So unless you can find an earlier tourney battle before mine to prove another clan's members were teaming, and you were just 'protecting' yourselves, please don't offer an excuse just for the sake of offering an excuse, and justifies your clan's action.
And since you openly admitted it's no fun to play alone and get teamed against, WHY are you then justifying your clan's action of teaming against MANY players who are either not in clans or trying to play without teaming? Hypocrisy?
And don't even let me start on your leader, please..
PS: I have nothing against you (or whoever I replied to regarding this topic). It's the teaming issue and statements made by various players I take offense with and thus, replied to, and not the players itself. Even if it was an admin or mod who have made such statements, I would have replied in exactly the same manner. |
| [Post deleted by moderator Takesister // Irrelevant post.] |
A 3 vs 3 GB, Winner Takes All, 20 battles, League-Style. Top 4 Teams compete in Swiss round for Top 4 finish through Semifinals then Finals.
Simple, crisp, quick, and above all, FAIR. |
Actually I would like tournament like 3v3 then all will play as a team.
This i`m not calling a honest and tournament where you will see the strongest players. (Like Elfs and DE - are strong but also good target to kill them first), knights with 90 guards - none are willing to go against them in first round so they just sit in corners (some of them) and cast defensive magic on them. And after all are dead then come out like a real hero. It is making me sick (take a look at this combat https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?warid=485128518 ) where I killed 2 heroes and then the rest of them kicked me out - so I came only 4th (but exp gained more than 2nd and 3 place)
So If in this tournament would count how much dmg you done in combat then I would be first or second in this match, but like this...
Anywy I suggest better to make team tournaments or tournaments against AI and when there will be more at lvl 13 and 14 then make another turnament.
P.S. This is good tournament anyway for lower lvl players (it is good chance them to lvl up) also tournament is good because new arena are made and need to see and force ppl to play on It.
So overall i`m satisfying about tournament the admins made, I just dont like how the layers are playing to win this tournament (It is common to watch where 2 players are going against each others and 3rd are staying in corner and watching it) and when they done then win the tournament I thinks this is not like real Heroes do - but in this case game requires to do so. :( |
Exactly - standing in the corner is the best tactic here. Poor! :-(
I tried to make them move with poisoning them, but then, of course, they all moved on me :-D Moreover, poison doesn't (fully) affect 2 main "standing" factions - Necros and Wizzard's gargyoles.
I'm not going to finish all 20 games. |
[Post deleted by moderator Kotrin // No personal attacks please.]
[Player banned by moderator Kotrin until 2009-12-07 11:06:06 // Ad-hominem attack. Warning.] |
Korzika, I suggest you to have a little more respect. Remember that is very easy to insult someone when you are at home, sitting in front of your computer. This must not be an excuse for bad behaviour.
I'm also surprised that mods didn't ban you for your complain against the so called "cheaters" (who definitely are not to be called in such a way, because what they have accused to do have been declared L-E-G-A-L).
Show more respect, please. |
Two options that would actually help this tournament:
1.Make it accessible for only 3 players from the same clan to at least have a fair 3vs3 at the beggining, which is fun.
2.Lift the prices, return the entering fee, let the tournament go just for fun. Winner might still be a rat but it will be fun so he would be funny rat then, right? People are just too obsessed with gold after these recent changes. Taking the gold away is taking the most problems away. |
