| Author | AP Cheaters |
|---|
| Tired of AP Cheaters. Lets make them popular, so that everyone may identify them. Any Ap cheats may be reported here with the cheats name and war ID. People create Ap limit matches not just because one does not have full arts, but also because others who dont have full arts may also join and cheaters in these matches must be put to the highlight. people may often read AP cheaters updates and update this tooo. |
1) Nobodiez in the war https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?warid=488694432.
Wantonly cheating with preplanned schemes to cheat exhibited by the player in the war. Itz a shame that he has been a part of "The Kingdom" military clan. |
| there's no point, we don't have control over whio can enter a battle so we can't stop them. |
| YEP he is right |
| navimegaman is so right, lol. You can have a list with all those people. What is the point? You can't stop them anyway. |
Lets make them popular
sounds good to me. although it's not illegal cheating, it still is a cheating of it's own kind - and cheaters are disease of any game. if nothing, expose them. maybe they will feel bad about it and stop.. or not. i'd go for it anyway |
| You can try to report them to clans, a lot of clans have rules against joining game without following "local" rules |
| doom |
The #529 GB Tourney Clan was created to combat just this problem though not been used much recently. Its members come from most of the main clans and are all levels 8+
However if you wish to arrange some battles (and are a member) then any of the herals can send a clan mail for you asking people to go to clan chat and/or join your battles. You can be sure that any and all battle description restrictions will be followed 100%. |
sounds good to me. although it's not illegal cheating, it still is a cheating of it's own kind -
usually it's financial cheaters who will join min ap battles with full arts
most players can't afford to do so regularly |
| Can choice of AP be made as game joining condition? We can already choose the range of levels of players we want in a fight, maybe we can also specify the ap range for joining. So if you're OE, you can't join. |
maybe we can also specify the ap range for joining
would fix this game in a stroke |
for jprajoy:
you are wrong, he is more than week not a member of our clan. |
Although it is frowned upon, joining min ap battles with full arts is not against the rules or illegal in any way, unless there is a new rule system i've not heard about yet like a citizens arrest. Not to encourage the people who do this, as it is as stated before, frowned upon and unhonorable.
Also, i don't think its such a great idea to have to specify the ap range. Perhaps if it was only optional, rather than every battle you had to specify it. Of course, i am not putting words into your mouth, because i know that you did not say you would HAVE to do this, but you also said nothing of being able to NOT do this, so just a suggestion. The reason for this suggestion is that not all equipment has the same amount of ap.
for example, if i remember correctly combat staffs give 6 ap. Lets say the battle is for 8 ap and lower. A class like a knight could wear a reprisal sword, a morale amulet (sorry, name escapes me.. it happens when your a necro :P), and a hauberk for the 8 ap. Because a wizard who would rather have spell power and defence than morale, they would be at a loss... i believe the knight would have an added 2 attack, 4 defence, AND 1 morale, where as the wizard would have only 1 attackk 1 spell power and 2 defence.. Restricting AP could prohibit many factions from playing smartly and therefor stop many of them from joining your battle.. This does not only affect wizards. Knights, who are strong by defence, would also be at a loss... how are they to equip defencive gear and play a battle while restricting AP? remember- you HAVE to have a weapon in your right hand to participate in combat.. you can't go throw on 8 ap of gear because the weapon adds at least one more. In this way, knights are at a loss, because a knight without defence is no better than a wizard without spell power. |
| Hmm this was ever been told before .. that should be a Pre-Combat Requirements about the APs .. I mean the Initiator can set how many max APs that each player could have |
The admins do not consider this illegal or a problem. The only way around it is to do clan only battles in a clan where they have a policy on this.
With the admins lack of attention on essential issues it is very unlikely that changes will be made to GB battle creation scripts.
#14 - You example of 8AP being unfair on some factions is not correct. Almost since the server was created people have been arranging fixed AP battles and it is all part of the strategy choosing what mix of arts you will take into battle. Remember that it is not only arts which you can use to adjust your skill points but also many talents. When you gain a few more levels to where more (and PvP experienced) players are doing GBs you will find that this is not really a factor. |
When someone starts a GB, here are some of the reasons why they may want a min AP battle :-
- Fight is about your skill and knowledge of tactics and strategy.
- Faster battles because units die faster on account of less def.
- Cheaper on arts because min AP encourages more ppl to join battle. Less people wanna commit max AP since gold is so hard to earn now thanks to workaholic. Better to save arts for caravans or even hunts, especially now when most high levels are getting harder hunts.
So when some1 comes over equipped for a min arts battle, it's kinda like takes the fun out of the fight because of the unfair advantage.
On the other hand, life's a bitch...and then you die. Cheaters everywhere. Suck it up and deal with it. |
