| Author | Reset Top Hunters List |
|---|
I suppose it is better to reset the top hunters list
because that list was too older(when the AI is not too intelligent)
But now it is more difficult to beat the AI of same amount as previous
So i suppose it is better to reset the list |
-1
Top hunters had to get really lucky and they had to come up with a lot of different methods to make that record.
Some records are still being made today, you know.
And sometimes, the new AI is better in some situations. |
The skill and tactics of the players have also improved. It's not impossible to beat any records on the list, with this new improved AI.
Just the other day I noticed one of my 1st places drop. And then it dropped another place a short while after! So two people were actually able to beat a score that had been there for about two years. |
Hi.
I also have a similar idea. Should I express here or in a new forum? |
if u have a similar idea, why make a new thread at all? :)
and as to resetting the hunt records, -1 (for the same reasons as _-TaintedWulf-_)
If u really want a record, work for it, don't ask for the list to be reset just so u can have ur name on it ;) |
| Well, you know, world records for athletics and swimming are erased every 10 years too to give a chance for EVERYONE to have his own record. Even the swimming pools get shortened once in a while. |
-1
its not hard to break the records.. players are smarter, have better equipment available, more enchanted weapons. the only problem is exp, not that creatures get smarter. |
it's a shame that this is a bad idea, because it would be fresh and nice and fun
but people who set records as they levelled up would lose them and have no way of remaking them |
I have an idea:
All players who have made a record would (1 by 1) replay that battle, in the exact same level, with the exact same arts they used, but with the new AI. They will get 2 tries (if I say 1 they will complain that their luck and morale boost didn't work in that battle) to re-beat those neutrals. Their exp and fsp gained from that battle won't change the exp and fsp they originally had. If they lose both, the original battle still counts and they still gained those exp and fsp, simply that they did not make it into the records.
Yes they will still gain 1 HG level. Why? Because otherwise people would complain, admins would have to adjust everything, and players can play like this: 100 - 160 - 208 - 130 - 270... which looks weird and will cause EVEN more people to complain if they lost, say, the 208 hunt, they would have said they would have won and everything...
In order to prevent lagg, the battles must go 1 by 1, as in firstly Titans (in all levels), or maybe in 14-7 then 6-1 are reset, and players who have made those record are given a chance to re-achieve that record. The time given is a week and any players who failed to re-achieve that record will lose 1 trophy and 1 place in the record. Following that, the next one, say first was Titans 14-7 for 1 week, next would be 6-1, next would be, say, Giants 14-7, then 6-1 ...
Ok?
And -1 to the original idea. |
My idea is to create a new hunter sheet.The old hunter records would stay as it is and itcan be accesed from the top hunters page like in excel sheet with name like pre june 2010 etc depending on when introduced. New hunter sheets can be again created after 1 year or so depending on the amount of updates. Also when a new hunter sheet is started, hunter records in new ones will be shown in player's profile only 1 month after the starting of the new one as there will be lots of breaking. Also in players profile records will be shown like this-
'third result in a hunt pre june2010' 'third result in a hunt june2010- x' and so on. |
| -1 |
-1
i break 3 records after the grand update
so no need for that .. |
for survive:
Your records are of shrews, rogues, and Renegade thugs. Shrews and rogues have almost no update, as they already used their abilities before, therefore about no change. Renegade thugs are a shooter, and therefore apply to the new shooter rules, which made it easier as shooters sometimes move away (only wizards will feel that it is harder). Therefore, all your hunt records were not harder at all, and is possible that someone else may beat them. Ever heard of the now-famous 'Royal griffins battle dive'? |
Well its a partly good idea because some are just much harder like royal griffs.
One the other hand players like Robai will love you for such suggestion. Many worked hard for their records in the past why shall we punish them?
I also suggest seperate lists after AI changes in some categorys.
In sports this is also happening javlin throwing p.e. |
| On post #2 I noticed "AI". What does it mean? |
The skill and tactics of the players have also improved. It's not impossible to beat any records on the list, with this new improved AI.
try to beat 1 of my royal griff records now that they battledive too :) |
try to beat 1 of my royal griff records now that they battledive too :)
In none of my hunts, they battle dived :(
I also suggest seperate lists after AI changes in some categorys.
Do you like post 10 ? |
its funny how only the ones complain who cant beat the records. if u cant compete with battledive then u probably dont deserve the record. u can try records with some other creatures without some special abilities. there is reason why its record and hard to achive, its not ment for average players.
dont fix something that is not broken. im absolutely sure this dive doesnt change that much since its so predictable. tho they only dive once per battle for me or not at all :(. i would like to break records in royal griffs, but i just cant wait til they come :P |
its funny how only the ones complain who cant beat the records.
XD
Agree with #18 100%
If u find some hunt records difficult then go for those hunts where the creatures don't have such abilities. I'm sure there are a few neutrals without battledive or volley :)
It's not the fault of current record holders that some records are almost impossible to beat, so I don't see any reason to erase their hard work just like that >,> |
'third result in a hunt pre june2010' 'third result in a hunt june2010- x' and so on.
but then people would have those hunt medals guaranteed forever, new players would probably complain about that as they never had chance, as well as if they're beaten they're beaten, doesnt matter when or how much
Following that, the next one, say first was Titans 14-7 for 1 week, next would be 6-1, next would be, say, Giants 14-7, then 6-1 ...
Ok?
That is definately not a viable solution, for a start it would take YEARS to get through the list at a rate of 1 creature every 2 weeks |
