| Author | Third Mixed Tournament |
|---|
why people join tournemant if they are gonna afk?
i lost 2 battle because of afk on my side
stupid... |
| Atheros, they loose a tons of gold with that battle, because the AP min is very high on this tournament, 51 on lvl10 for example... |
| u know what,this time i thoroughly enjoyed the tournament.very nice event,and i felt the games are really balanced xcept very rare occasions.thanx admins for a hard work on this.the only problem was afkers,but that was also quite rare. |
| Hi to balance the battles , I suggest magis face only players (their level-2or3) or above after lvl 10 unless there is a player of same or higher lvl bcause if there are lower lvls, one fireball would kill most of the units .This is especially for wizards bcause they have the greatest adv when fighting a group of lower lvls, with their mini arts and survival + running units. |
i felt the games are really balanced xcept very rare occasions
Really? You are lucky then. Only about 3-4 of my 12 combats were close ones. It depended mostly on luck for me. Just see my last 2 battles where coolahed and I got really unlucky. |
| I feel games are mostly balanced in terms of levels. But it falls short when accounting for faction balances and builds. I've had battles where it looked sort of balanced in the beginning, but turned out really one-sided by middle-game. Not that it can be helped, really. Overall, I rate this tournament very good. |
I think how balanced the battles are is generally not bad, though if you join a battle when there is a low number of people, it will be unavoidably unfair. There is only a limited number of combinations 8 people can be put into, and one or more of these are likely to be unequal.
Unfortunately this will overly penalise those people who log on at times of low server load, though equally for every unfair mix to the negative for someone, there will be an unfair mix to teh positive for someone else. Consequently if this effect is significant you may find a random winner or high placer, that happened to be on the correct side of the unequal matches. |
i think winner will have 11 victories.
or is there anybody with 0 losses and 12 battle already? |
Only viable contender for 11 victories I have spied in logs is
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4313573
with 7 wins and 1 loss.
Other than that everyone I have seen has 2 losses or more. This could change is some play a lot between now and the deadline. |
11 victories:
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_info.php?id=4334108 |
9 point((((
to bad((((
but was interesting |
| ;) |
9 point((((
to bad((((
but was interesting
me too :)) |
congrats mrniceguy
https://www.lordswm.com/tournaments_hist.php?tour=51&tid=616 |
| And also congrats to Elletrico ! Nice game mate :) |
| Looks like high level players did quite well in this |
Looks like high level players did quite well in this
Its because they make their own game, and is less dependent on drawing good teammates |
OMG! 1,066 people did take place in this tournament and in the top 100 are people with 4 wins! That means less than 35% win and the rest will be even worse. It seems that MANY, MANY, MANY people stop playing the tournament with half their fights played.
It seems to be a big disapointment. |
It's because almost every fight last more than one hour and if someone has 2 or 3 accounts it's no wonder he wasn't able to finish tourney battles for all his chars.
I barely was able to complete all 24 battles for me and alt. |
in the top 100 are people with 4 wins
I believe it is the top 500. |
