| Author | Russian website which analyzes win rates of various builds of factions |
|---|
Link - http://lgnd.ru/gt/battle
Translation to English is tricky, I am still figuring it out...
Below are the list of terms I have translated from Google Translate English to "proper" English based on https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=2558240
Handy woman (umelka) = Faction level
M = Standard ammunition ~ I'm not sure about this
MK = Standard enchanted ammunition
CCD = Free for all; rare arts
CM = Spell power
at = attack points
zasch = defense points
exactly / smooth = balanced attack and defense points |
M = Standard ammunition ~ I'm not sure about this
Shop arts |
| Thank you! |
I really like that webpage, yet the Winrates and all these stuff seem quite innacurate, Tbh.
I've been using it for a long time, but I only enter it to watch Replays, and so on.
Idk, feels like Win ratios are biased, or only take into account X last amount of battles. Also does not include battles from Tournaments IIRC, and so on. |
They only include non-bot CG battles, at under any particular category, only the previous 100.
Yet, for many, that is exactly what we need.
Tournament wins shouldn't be matched with CG wins, because you will almost always have a greater tournament win rate.
That's because tournaments often have much weaker players on average, then CG. |
| Is it still updated? I can't find fire dwarf. |
I really like that webpage, yet the Winrates and all these stuff seem quite innacurate, Tbh.
Which winrates do you mean. I think I found the tournament balance sheet. It take into account make than 100 battles for sure.
http://lgnd.ru/mt45/balance/lvl/17
Is it still updated? I can't find fire dwarf.
It was updated 2-3 days ago. |
| 90% win rate... Only classic demon is doing not badly. |
| UPDATE: Website is down :( |
| https://daily.heroeswm.ru/gt/balance |
| Seems like there's some kind of miscommunication between the original creator and daily though, based on the message he left on the website :( |
| Thanks Marquis, nice to see you 2 years later |
