About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
17:23
4463
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->General game forum-->

[Update] [Everyone or oneself battles in CG]


1|2|3

Author[Update] [Everyone or oneself battles in CG]
Somehow it's not there now, but it's all over the .ru forums. Maybe they are still testing it.

https://www.lordswm.com/war.php?lt=-1&warid=1209014752&html5=1

Exp-CG points ratio seems very bad, atleast for now.
I saw a purple CG symbol on the battle tab and was wondering what it was. Makes sense now.
It's not only eofo, it's blindfolded! Looks great, so many mind games :)
Yeah. It's up again. Purple logo. :D
Yes. It will be up twice per day. News in translation.
Wtf am I supposed to start playing again now!?
Ah nice, I remember these EOFO battles from many years ago. They were always good fun but heavily biased towards the meaty factions. I remember poison build being quite effective also
How does that work now, do we get it at :50? Because if that's so, why not make it :00, :20 and :40?
I guess there will be bots in that too?
Guess Dev's are testing it out before full release, hopefully no bots in this one. It will rune the match.
for Murali:
I guess it will be the only form of CG where bots will be viable. Imagine the game with 6 players and everyone taking 30 seconds, the battle may go on for 3 hours in few cases. Also, players will try to take out the player with better stats first and may try to gang up on one. Having 2-3 bots will provide randomness to the game and will make it more fun. But number of bots should be fixed and uniform. Players would also try to identify the bots and try not to die before them in order to get more CG points. That's my opinion though. There will be cons too I am sure.
incoming 6 defense tribal warfare. you heard it here first lmao
for Botmun:
My only objection against bots is that there have pre defined priority compared to players who prioritise based on alliance / enemies.

I remember we used to have 2v2v2 eofo blindfolded tournament where there was dark tower and only one 2 players in it. I don't mind if we get bots like that.

for slayerofall:
Couple of mages can easily overwhelm them )
demon as winner...nice
for Murali:
It will be hard to formulate any teams. I dont think it is possible to chat in the battle
for lord fallen:
Chat is disabled as it's blindfolded game( we won't know whom we are playing with ), just team up/ make enemy with people with action in game.
My only objection against bots is that there have pre defined priority compared to players who prioritise based on alliance / enemies.
Exactly. One of the cons. :D
incoming 6 defense tribal warfare. you heard it here first lmao

My money on dark barbs.
Cool that they try to make more people play PVP , but i prefer 2x2 witch is only once per hour :(
for Marquis Thornwald:
dark barbs have very little chance vs tribals at my level. That shaman in the corner is undefeatable because it can accumulate spirit and mana indefinitely without attacking someone or committing to an enemy. It could be different if a non-defensive participant helps break the wall. Now we have fire dwarfs so it could be different but I remember participating in blindfold tournament where alt dwarf did not exist and defensive tribals were simply unbeatable. Let's just say the few mages we had would always prioritize killing the 60-70 attack might players over a defensive tribal. Shadow barbs were at best the #2 class.
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.
1|2|3
Back to topics list
2008-2023, online games LordsWM