About the game
News
Sign in
Register
Top Players
Forum
5:46
1304
 online
Authorization required
You are not logged in
   Forums-->Queries and help-->

AuthorThief set compared to Full art lvl 10
Hi,

A question to the more experienced players:

I'm playing a lvl 10 barbarian. What would more powerful to me? A thief set or a lvl 10 full art set without milthril arts?

I just want to know in which cases a thief set pays out...

I've never seen a high level character wearing a thief set in group battles, so here are shop arts obviously more powerful.

What about ambushes, hunts and merc quests?
For group and duel i would say level 10 arts are better.

But for ambushes, hunts and merc i would say thief. It makes your units faster 10% more powerful and gives resistances.

Check chrisl battle he uses theif set for most things.
chrisl is a DE, so the thief set works very well. i think the thief set is less useful to barbarians and other factions.

Since I'm not level 10, and I haven't fully tested the shop arts vs thief set, I can't truly say, but that's my guess.

I know that thief set works very well for DE in ambushes, but I'm going to test out shop arts for knight combats.
yea that thief set...makes shrews +9 speed ^^

For Group battles as others said, wearing thief set = suicide.

For NPC battles it is awesome.

But I hope you do wear at least thief cloak in group battles (or long bow), and maybe even the thief dagger--don't forget the thief amulet :)

Cheers,

LS
Thief cloak and thief amulet is useful in every battle.

but thief sets got a low def and will die out soon in the group battles.

thief arts is very nice for ambush and anti-ambush, especially for elf and de, but I don't think they are so useful for other fractions.
Yeahh I agree with Master TI .. I think Level 10 arts are better ONLY in PvP .. but for Hunting, MGs and TGI, Thieves are the best .. I am curious if they are compare with FULL GH set .. ?? ANy ideas ?? I think GH is better .. in everything .. :)
#6

I'm not sure about the GH set. Hunting definitely is better, but I doubt it's better in anything else. By the way the GH set bonus against neutrals only work in hunts.
Yeahh hunts and mercenaries as long as I know .. ^^ but at PvP .. I never try them .. ^^
Set_sveta (necro) used enchanted Thief set in PvP pretty efficiently.

Overall, it's a matter of preference I think :)
As the person referred to above, I thought I should give my opinion as well :)

I love the thief set, especially with a couple of enchanted weapons. The thief set also gives +29% initiative and increases the speed of all troops by 1, it provides the following stats with all primary points except one put into attack:

[Attack] +21
[Defence] +9
[Spell Power] 0
[Knowledge] +2
[Luck] +1
[Morale] +2
[Initiative] +29%
AP: 52

Hence the idea is to strike fast before the opponent gets a chance to move and kill the most dangerous troops before they get a shot. This works very well for merc quests, ambushes and hunts. For PvP I havent really tested it out much but the one 3vs3 I did participate in with the thief set it was quite deadly in the beginning especially with the shrews with speed 9.

The thief amulet is great when combined with a full arts set instead of the luck amulet as it gives you +1 morale and +3% initiative as well.
Thanks for your opinions so far!

But don't you think a warriors pendant is a bit better for barbs then a thief amulet?
I would still use Thief amulet :)

But you can alternate. I like having +1 luck whenever possible, just for the "thrill" factor. But I personaly preferred Morale over Luck as a 'living' being army hehe.

Cheers,
LS
[Post deleted by moderator Pang // off-topic, insult]
[Player banned by moderator Shebali until 2009-03-28 09:03:22 // Flood in QaH, relapse of 2.5, insulting players and mods]
This topic is long since last update and considered obsolete for further discussions.

Back to topics list
2008-2024, online games LordsWM