| Author | Lorekeeper monster |
|---|
https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?lt=-1&warid=12415564
55 mana? is this real? |
It's my match, you were watching it. What's the doubt of the 'real-ness'?
It's Lorekeeper-Monster {5} for the record, ok? It's meant to be hard. |
| The more the number here {} the more tougher the monster |
| But the manas? |
| Wow. I am impressed. I never realized how useful those infected zombies can be. I can't even attempt Lorekeeper-Monster{4}, let alone {5}, and I'm level 10. |
| Hmm.. Does infected Strike have a 100% success rate? As long as the Infected Zombie hits, it WILL be an infected Strike, thus reducing Attack and Defense parameter by 4? |
yes, necro is best at doing monster merc quest. If monster is melee, just bring max vampire, decent amount of zombies and one stack of ranged(either archer or lich). Split zombies block ranged and hit with them as much as they could.
Vampire can then solo the monster with ease. |
Does infected Strike have a 100% success rate?
Yes.
Vampire can then solo the monster with ease.
It's because if you bring the att and def of the monster to 0, there's a high chance the amount of damage you drain back is more than what he can deal out. |
"necro is best at doing monster merc quest."
Wrong ^
I thought this too when I decided to make a necro ONLY for doing merc missions...and then I switched to Wizard, and I can guarantee you, that a factioned wizard is the king of ALL PvM missions xD
Cheers,
LS |
"necro is best at doing monster merc quest."
Wrong ^
It's TRUE about monsters.
Wizzards just have additional SP against everyone but players. The topic is not about who is the best at MG, but about monsters. And necros are really the best. The second best are knights with their upgraded archers. |
The topic is not about who is the best at MG, but about monsters
Wrong.
This topic is about how come a Lorekeeper-monster had 55 mana.
We are going off topic.
Question Answered. Thread closed. |
| closed by Lady Takesister (2009-06-27 05:11:17) |
|---|
