| Author | What's wrong with so many people here? (Group Battles) |
|---|
Hey,
I feel a bit annoyed, because everywhere I look people are out for easy wins and unfair battles. They set up battles like 2 vs 2 (1-14 vs 3-4) or come with as many arts they can gather in minimum AP battles?
At my level a fair fight is really seldom when I set up a gb.
That's bad for the game and I know people who think about quitting because they just want fun in fair battles which they don't get here.
I don't want to know how many people quit because of this reason or don't do group fights anymore. PvP, for many people the most interesting in the game, doesn't work like this and you can see it at the little number of gb going on.
Maybe it should be thought about making a battle violation out of ignoring battle descriptions about AP.
Better: You players who are just out for easy xp should think about yourself.
Thanks for reading,
Nutella |
| Why do you think some people dont play Group Battles and focus only on PvE, because group battles arent fair. Thats about it :P |
| A solution players can do is to just create their own group battles with random as the type. This would limit the advantage players can get. |
That's one of the answers I did expect. Like "Live with it and do something else". I don't want to and believe that things can change.
Maybe a petition to admin would do it? |
| Just like pantheon said, you can create your own battle. setup lvl 5-5 random or 5-6 random, people will join. |
Last was directed to #2
#3: That's a possible solution but not if you have a favourite team partner you want to battle with. |
| don't worry dude, it gets better at higher levels, though you will always find some who want to spoil your fun :( |
How about a mask like the level restriction for AP. That can't be such an effort to program.
Set max AP, higher can't join, done! |
| #7: I am sure that you're right, but I don't really want to fight thousand of monster mobs before I can dare to fight a gb. |
For Nutella:
Fight duels. You can always refuse, if you see that your opponent has many AP. |
Maybe a petition to admin would do it?
No, it will just lead to a thread lock.
Now, I 100% understand your issue. Creating group battles is a delicate balance between AFK players in your team and guys in full arts in the other one...
It would be very easy for admins to enforce an AP limit in group battles. After years of existence, I guess one should be blind not to see similar requests on forum for such a change. But it won't happen. There are a number of reasons for that. Here are several ones, pick the one(s) that best fit your views:
- If people can FORCE AP level, why bother enrolling and purchasing artifacts in the first place? We'll only see min AP battles, I'm ready to bet.
- Giving an advantage to people wearing arts is pushing people to enroll and involve in the game.
- Factions are not balanced depending on AP level. Game is only balanced with full arts in mind.
The only way of protecting you from high AP players is to set full AP battles. But that's much more work to you. |
The only way of protecting you from high AP players is to set full AP battles
its better too because
Factions are not balanced depending on AP level. Game is only balanced with full arts in mind.
|
if you have a favourite team partner you want to battle with.
In any case, Group Battles are not for us, Wizards. For us is LG, LG and LG! |
|
#11:
First, how can I quote?
To your reasons:
"- If people can FORCE AP level, why bother enrolling and purchasing artifacts in the first place? We'll only see min AP battles, I'm ready to bet."
Maybe, but I think there would be many MORE battles, which leads to your next point.
"- Giving an advantage to people wearing arts is pushing people to enroll and involve in the game."
Because of more battles people will still be in need of arts. Perhaps more, many people avoid it now to play gb and hoarding gold. PvP is like a unwanted child at the moment, many people do only PvE because AFK and unfair battles suck some day.
"- Factions are not balanced depending on AP level. Game is only balanced with full arts in mind."
OK, I don't know this exactly, but in my view one or two mistakes in tactics can change this advantage fast. |
#13: I feel quite fine with GB and most times I win.
#14: OK, maybe I have to watch out for a good clan, but it's much PM writing to arrange a 2 vs 2. |
OK, maybe I have to watch out for a good clan, but it's much PM writing to arrange a 2 vs 2.
Chat is there to make things easier. |
To 11: Kotrin
I don't know why you assume game is balanced in full arts? Give me some evidence. At least you need a lot of duels with full arts to verify your conclusion.
For my opinion, this game is never balanced actually. For example, if a knight faces a wizard in random, no matter with full arts or just min AP, the knight has over 90 percent of chance to lose. But if a wizard faces a Barb, then the wizard has little chance to win. Do not make arguments simply by your imagination without any real evidence. |
For example, if a knight faces a wizard in random, no matter with full arts or just min AP, the knight has over 90 percent of chance to lose
now, do prove it, because i can guarantee you that i can wear arts to get up to 22 SP and easily loose against a knight of same level, thanks to enchantments, cape of arcane protection and many other little things that do make my magic quite useless.
Mini arts? of course, but it won't be enough to get to 90%, far from that.. Show me that i am wrong. |
| if you are easily losing to a knight then you aren't playing right. just run around with your gargs and kill us with magic... |
