| Author | rating |
|---|
hey guys wouldnt it be fun if characters rate players
honorable : **** (five stars max)
worthy : ****
trusty : *****
behaviour : ****
strategist : ****
wat r ur opinions on it? |
+1 for the idea.
But there might just be players creating multis to vote bad for others and good for themselves.
BTW what would be the use of the rankings? (Ain't levels just a way of rankings/ratings) |
| Cheats would just get all their multi's to rate them as *****. |
1000 or more than 1000 player will rate de average will be taken
wat if dey use multi dey can get 3-4 votes like dat
players will get to know each other i would b good |
| not i its(it) |
wat if dey use multi dey can get 3-4 votes like dat
3 or 4 cheats can often easily call upon their 100+ multis to improve their own ratings or destroy someone else. |
| I generally like the idea that a character has some kind of "reputation". Perhaps it would work ok with some limitations, like you can grade someone just once with +1 or -1, or you can grade just once and have to be same level as the char you're grading (multis are usualy lower level). You can grade someone -1 if he/she goes afk on you, or insults you, cheats,... and +1 if he/she helps you in hunt or puts up a good battle (either with you or against you). That way no one would take notice of reputation -3 or +3, but someone with -32 would have trouble to find someone to join with him in group battle and probably try to earn his reputation back. |
i think this would be a fun addition to the game.. i would certainly like to know what others thought about me. As for post 7, i like the original post better. What if everybody thought u were unhonorable because you did one thing like you accidentally wrote something you shouldn't have in the forums etc. Then you would have - some points and people might take it that you had bad behaviour in games or that you weren't a good strategist.. In the original post there is an answer to this problem, you can rate many different characteristics of the person.
As for cheaters, if they want to cheat and make it look like they are honorable and trusty etc, we will all know anyways that they aren't.. all you have to do is click "transfer log" :/ |
| +1 good idea, i could relly know my friend's behaviuor :) |
| Good idea, but too open to abuse by multis. A times lost battles to AFK would be a useful rating though. |
Good idea, but too open to abuse by multis. A times lost battles to AFK would be a useful rating though.
It's true.. =( |
rating would work but can't be based on character cast votes
would have to relate to comparitive achievements in different forms of battle |
Additional idea:
This vote would only find place after a Group Battle -> multis cannot simply vote they should complete a GB of 45-90 mins to be able to vote!
Furthermore players of your level or similar +/- 1-2 lvl-s were rate other players -> i mean no lvl 1-2 players were able to rate higher lvl experienced players |
Additional idea:
This vote would only find place after a Group Battle -> multis cannot simply vote they should complete a GB of 45-90 mins to be able to vote!
Furthermore players of your level or similar +/- 1-2 lvl-s were rate other players -> i mean no lvl 1-2 players were able to rate higher lvl experienced players
Better idea, but still... some players will just vote negatively if they were beaten. Why not limit it to grading your team? |
