| Author | Ambushing |
|---|
Usually I fight against caravans, but for the last few days I had planety of them before I finally coughta a hero. (hero - 39 caravans - hero)
Is there any forumla for this or it is completely random? |
| it is completely random |
| It is what ever falls into your ambush first |
| it is totally random |
| Yes, random. But i think it depends on the number of players at your level. When i look at the combat loq of a level 6 character, i see 20% humans. If i look on my loq i see 5%. There are only 300 (+-100) at lv 12, so i think the probability is decrased. |
it's not completing random
there are places or methods witch let you get more heroes
look this player combat log
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_warlog.php?id=4572187
i don't discoverd his secret yet :) |
look this player combat log
https://www.lordswm.com/pl_warlog.php?id=4572187
i don't discoverd his secret yet :)
That's truely enigmatic. |
It is not random and all depends on what other players are doing. If someone your level travels the route (and not in same MC as you) then if ambush is triggered you will catch them.
If they are level 6+, not your level and travel the route, then if ambush is triggered you will get a caravan. |
Back in the day, more players would be caught by thieves since renting was allowed.
But now, numbers have decreased because of such high prices.
Admins want you to buy TGI via diamonds, and it probably will be your only way to get a TGI, because prices currently (840k) will probably skyrocket again. |
Back in the day, more players would be caught by thieves since renting was allowed.
But now, numbers have decreased because of such high prices.
Trying to understand your answer to my question, I came up to this:
Only thiefs can be cought by thiefs. - That's ludicrous.
to DiN:
Thanks for solid answer. |
Trying to understand your answer to my question, I came up to this:
Only thiefs can be cought by thiefs. - That's ludicrous.
What do you mean? I stated more players would be caught by thieves since renting was allowed.
Meaning travelers (players) would be caught be thieves (the ambusher)
But since you received a solid answer, that's good.
I suppose your question is resolved? |
Ok, let me get it straight.
back in the day, more players would be caught by thieves since renting was allowed
So, back in the day we have more people who were in TG.
And only because we had more thiefs each of them could catch a hero more often then me today?
I suppose your question is resolved?
Let me decide when my problem is solved. |
If you want to catch more players, be a true thief and follow your targets.
Find a couple wealthy merchants (players of your level who travel a lot) and set ambushes on their path.
If you look at the given combat log, he ambushed the same players again and again. |
Answer from .ru:
~90% - caravans
~10% - people
The formula is unknown. |
I have one more questions concerning caravans (don't want to start new topic).
How does strengh of my caravans looks if i switch to other fraction?
If i switch to Knight(f.e.) and i will make my caravans weaker by constant losting will my caravans on DE be weaker too? |
I'll purposely not answer your first question since there has been some changes and player debates on the comparable caravan difficulities.
If i switch to Knight(f.e.) and i will make my caravans weaker by constant losting will my caravans on DE be weaker too?
Yes. The reverse is also true if you were win a lot and make your caravans stronger. |
one more...
Is it possible to set ambush with basic fraction troops? (those form 1 st combat level - no investing into new fraction) |
Is it possible to set ambush with basic fraction troops? (those form 1 st combat level - no investing into new fraction)
No. For all combats (except ones in which you are a victim of an ambush) you have to use sufficient troops. "sufficient" is defined as with "most" of your buildings. This is different and may vary with combat level, faction, and the way you set your recruitment. I believe the talent rally helps boost your troops to meet the "sufficient" requirement. |
| closed by latawica (2010-05-19 01:53:28) |
|---|
