| Author | penality |
|---|
hello
could people have a penality because enter in blindfold battle then they do 2 vs 1?
when i says 2 versus 1 means that they didn't try to attack each other but only attack the third person
they make the game very worst and make the person afraid to enter in such battle
thanks for your time
zuzumiliano |
https://www.lordswm.com/forum_messages.php?tid=1853328
8. Temporary treaties in 'Everyone for oneself' (or Blindfold battles) are not forbidden. If two or three players unite for eliminating the fourth - it is not a game rules violation. But consider that this rule does not permit participating the same combat with additional characters or from one computer |
This not against the rules. However its all about gaming ethics. It seems that the opponents who gang you are from the same clan =D
bad luck to you..next time better don't join these type of battle..who knows they planned from the beginning?
just me 1 cent thoughts |
yes but same clan and i think that a level 13 don't need to unite a level 12 to fight a level 12 player
i think that need a penality
it's for the game
people so could enter blindfold battles and not be afraid of unite of clan people for do exp
i think to remember that there is a rule that says that people can't do battle for do winning the other one.
I think that do a such battle violated this rule
i mean that the person that have to win help the other to kill the third person, the other clan person instead kill the third person and lose a lot of troops, so who have to win have an easy win
i think this is the rule
3.16. Staged combats leading one of the parties to losing a priori will be punished for. A staged combat by definition is one where any one of the parties or party members intentionally loses to the other for any reason different from having technical problems with access to the game. Instigation to losing a combat is also forbidden. |
i think this is the rule
3.16. Staged combats leading one of the parties to losing a priori will be punished forr. A staged combat by definition is one where any one of the parties or party members intentionally loses to the other for any reason different from having technical problems with access to the game. Instigation to losing a combat is also forbidden.
So you are saying that the person that lost this battle should be punished, because it lost itentionally?
I really don't think that you are saying that zuzumiliano did lost on purpose and therefore should be punished. |
https://www.lordswm.com/warlog.php?lt=-1&warid=24579490
something fishy there..the vampire just teleport to beside Roc and he didn't attack..i wonder why he made that move..its not like Roc will retaliate when vampire attack
hmm.. |
i says this
and i'm sure that they want to do so
and the person that win must be punished too
otherwise they could use abandoned account for loose battle |
I don't understand - so If you gonna join BF and win it - All will be all ok - but if someone else be a winner - for sure, he must plays against rule ?
Games like Free for all or Blind field - in quint essential - that you were looking for a "temporary alliance" to win the game -
I always attack the strongest - and I'm happy when the others do same. Eliminate the potential winner, to take his place. Am I right?
So if you are to weak or don't have right strategy, do not play this game - But if you're the MAN, instead of crying join my battles. I always looking forward - for a good Challenger :) |
if your clan member are MEN don't need to unit for win so easy
if your clan member are MEN they come there to speak instead of sent someone
if your clan member are MEN they will accept the group battle 2 vs 2 instead of run
i think they play against the rule
we will see what moderator will decide |
[Post deleted by moderator Omega22 // ]
[Player banned by moderator Omega22 until 2010-10-06 16:28:39 // Dont insult others, if you cant help, dont post.] |
yes we could battle
but i wont to know if person that plasy so could be punished for the well of the game |
| Zuzu if u were a man u wouldnt be surprised that necro owns a barb when u are letting him to do so, as a third party you had the means of eliminating me or LORD, so dont whine now when u dont have that power to balance the battle. Winner had been set by YOU, we just had a treaty of not attacking our clanmates before someone else's units are still standing. |
i don't let no one to do so
i do a fireball to vamps, apparition, death envoys, slow skellies
then for do exp i do a fireball to cyclops wolf and orc chiefes (only at the end)
if he didn't attack you is easy to win :D |
| Yup as i was saying u couldnt have won becouse of our treaty but ur spells could ve done more dmg to me, instead u attackem barb with a resistance |
well
that that reason i open this topic
why people have to enter in a battle where they lose at 100% because other player make a treaty?
and i do fireball at the barb beacuse i was dead and i try to do more damage i could ^^
in fact i do very few experience then your friend |
| The rules are simple, we could have a pact so this topic dont have a right to exist anyway^^ |
there are a lot of rules
so i write before
3.16. Staged combats leading one of the parties to losing a priori will be punished for. A staged combat by definition is one where any one of the parties or party members intentionally loses to the other for any reason different from having technical problems with access to the game. Instigation to losing a combat is also forbidden.
and he let win you |
| seriously how old are you, we didnt know what opponents are in bf, we werent attacking each other until u died so its not a mater of our vert choice... |
Any choice of opponents or teaming up in EFO/blindfold battles is NOT against the rules.
If they didnt attacked each other after you were gone and let one of them win, its against the rules and feel free to report them.
Conclusion: Most EFO battles are highly unetchical, unfair and only the sleaziest fish wins. If you cant deal with this, dont join or only join with friends/ fair clans who dont do this. Its up to you to find out.
If the only problem in your battle was that they ganged up on you like teammates, no rule break here. |
| Keep this civil please. |
